All categories

1 year ago

In the past few years, the demand for donuts has decreased. this would be illustrated by a change from?

Business

1 answer:

zepelin [54]1 year ago

3 0

The decrease in demand would be illustrated by a change from A to C.

<h3>What will be the change?</h3>

The demand curve is a downward sloping curve that shows the relationship between price and the quantity demanded. There is a negative relationship between price and quantity demanded.

A change in demand is caused by other factors other than the price of the good. Other factors include a change in income, a change in consumer taste or a change in the price of substitute goods.

When there is a change in demand, the demand curve would shift either to the right or to the left. When demand decreases, the demand curve would shift to the left. When demand increases, the demand curve would shift to the right.

Since, the demand for donuts have decreased, the demand curve would shift to the left. This would be a shift from A to C.

Please find attached the complete question. To learn more about the demand curve, please check: brainly.com/question/25140811

#SPJ1

You might be interested in

maria has decided to send a letter to her state representative regarding the ten industrial plants in her community that release

otez555 [7]

Maria involved with tragedy of the commons phenomenon.

The required details for tragedy of the commons in given paragraph

In economics, the tragedy of the commons is a scenario wherein man or woman users, who've open get right of entry to to a useful resource unhampered with the aid of using shared social systems or formal guidelines that govern get right of entry to and use, act independently in step with their personal self-interest and, opposite to the not precise of all users, reason depletion of the useful resource via their uncoordinated action. The idea originated in an essay written in 1833 with the aid of using the British economist William Forster Lloyd, who used a hypothetical instance of the results of unregulated grazing on not land in Great Britain and Ireland. The idea have become broadly referred to as the "tragedy of the commons" over a century later after a piece of writing written with the aid of using Garrett Hardin in 1968. Faced with proof of ancient and present commons, Hardin later retracted his authentic thesis, mentioning that the name must have been "The Tragedy of the Unmanaged Commons".

Although taken as a hypothetical instance with the aid of using Lloyd, the ancient death of the commons of Britain and Europe resulted now no longer from misuse of long-held rights of utilization with the aid of using the commoners, however from the commons' owners enclosing and appropriating the land, abrogating the commoners' rights.

To know about tragedy of the commons click here

brainly.com/question/9680058

#SPJ4

8 0

2 years ago

On January 1 a company purchased a five-year insurance policy for $2,300 with coverage starting immediately. If the purchase was

Vesnalui [34]

Answer:

Correct answer is D, Debit Insurance Expense, $460; credit Prepaid Insurance, $460

Explanation:

The company uses asset method of recording the purchase of insurance. Hence, at end of year end the company must recognize the expire portion of the policy and charge it against insurance expense.

$2,300 / 5 years = $460 (annual insurance expense)

Entry:

Debit Insurance expense $460

Credit Prepaid insurance $460

The balance of the prepaid insurance at the end of first year is $1,840 (2,300 - 460).

3 0

3 years ago

In the AS/AD model, as the price level falls, the holders of money become richer and buy more. This is one reason why the aggreg

ioda

Answer:

True

Explanation:

The statement is true.

Suppose a consumer purchases a bundle of goods, say 40 units with his given money income of $1000.

Now, if there is a fall in the price level of the goods then this will increase the purchasing power of the consumer and hence he will be able to buy more quantity of goods, say 60 units with the same level of money income i.e $1,000.

This illustrates that as the price level falls, the purchasing power of the consumer increases or we can say that holders of money become richer.

4 0

3 years ago

Calculate Payroll An employee earns $44 per hour and 1.5 times that rate for all hours in excess of 40 hours per week. Assume th

Ket [755]

Answer:

The correct answer for option (a) is $3,080 and for option (b) is $2,141.

Explanation:

(a). Current pay = $44

After 40 hours, Pay = $44 × 1.5 = $66

So, we can calculate the gross pay by using following formula:

Gross pay = (40 hours × $44 ) + (20 hours × $66)

= $1,760 + $1,320

= $3,080

(b).

Security Tax = Gross pay × 6% = $3,080 × 6% = $184.8

Medicare Tax = Gross pay × 1.5% = $3,080 × 1.5% = $46.2

Federal Income Tax = $708

So, we can calculate the net pay by using following formula:

Net Pay = $3,080 - $184.8 - $46.2 - $708

= $2,141

3 0

3 years ago

A debtor owed a creditor $1,200 on a promissory note that was due on August 1. After the debtor told the creditor that he might

Ilya [14]

Answer:

The correct option is C. Yes, because the debtor incurred a different obligation than he already had.

Explanation:

Note: This question is not complete as the options are omitted. The question is therefore completed before answering the question by providing the options as follows:

A. No, because the debtor incurred no additional detriment that would serve as consideration for the new agreement.

B. Yes, because it would have cost the creditor $1,200 to purchase the entertainment system himself.

C. Yes, because the debtor incurred a different obligation than he already had.

D. Yes, because the new agreement between the debtor and the creditor is enforceable with or without

Explanation of the answer is now provided as follows.

It is possible to enforce the two parties' new agreement as an accord.

An accord can be described as an agreement in which one party to an existing contract agrees to accept some other, different performance from the other party in lieu of the performance that the other party is obligated to provide. In principle, an agreement must be backed by payment, but the consideration can be less than the amount agreed upon in the preceding contract if it is of a different character or the claim is to be paid to a third party. The responsibility of the debtor to supply the creditor with a new entertainment system was enough fresh consideration to constitute a legal agreement in this case.

When a party's responsibility is modified in some way, as the debtor's duty was in this case, the preceding legal duty rule does not apply. It makes no difference whether the creditor's benefit in the accord arrangement is equal to the original debt's worth; courts will find appropriate consideration if the consideration is fresh or different in any way. The difference in the debtor's obligation, that is, payment is in the form of an entertainment system rather than cash) is enough to sustain the accord arrangement, regardless of how much the entertainment system would have cost the creditor.

The Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) does not apply because the original agreement was not for the sale of goods. The underlying commitment in this case was to pay a debt secured by a promissory note.

Therefore, the correct option is C. Yes, because the debtor incurred a different obligation than he already had.

6 0

3 years ago