Answer:
Lisa's doctor will likely identify her son's condition as fetal alcohol syndrome.
Explanation:
Fetal alcohol syndrome develops when a pregnant woman <em>exposes her fetus to alcohol</em>. It causes serious brain damage and growth issues on the child, as well as <em>behavioral and learning problems.</em>
Some symptoms may include:
- Small head size
- Abnormal facial features
- Difficulty maintaining attention
- Learning disabilities
- Short height
In this case we can see some of these symptoms in Lisa's son such as a <em>slow physical growth, facial abnormalities, small brain size and emotional and behavioral disturbances.</em> It is likely Lisa exposed him to alcohol during her pregnancy.
Answer:
west
Explanation:
no naan from south on west.
C There are three branches of government with three different levels in each
Answer:
Middle-class women were in a private circle. They stayed home, took care of kids, and did house chores. On the other side, middle-class men were in the public circle. They went outside from home and do work in the industry.
Explanation:
Men and women grew up in different worlds. Middle-class women stayed home and take care of their kids, prepare meals, clean the house, and do all the other house chores while middle-class men go outside the home and do work in the world of industry, politics, and commerce.
Explanation:
It’s hard to imagine a political institution less suited to a 21st-century liberal democracy than the Electoral College. It arose from a convoluted compromise hammered out late in the Constitutional Convention, and the rise of political parties in the late 18th century and the spread of democratic ideals in the early 19th quickly undermined its rationales. If it didn’t exist, no one today would consider creating it.
But the Electoral College is worse than merely useless. Its primary function is to malapportion political power, and it does so — indeed, has always done so — with strikingly awful consequences. A state is entitled to a number of electors equal to its number of senators and representatives. Before the Civil War, the combination of the Electoral College and the Three-Fifths Clause, counting a slave as three-fifths of a person, gave the Slave Power outsize control in electing the president, with the consequence that antebellum presidents were almost always either slaveholders or at least friendly to their interests (the major exceptions were both named Adams). After the war, every person counted as a full person for apportionment purposes — but with the collapse of Reconstruction and the violent disfranchisement of African-Americans throughout the South, that increase in representation once again redounded only to the benefit of white male power-holders, a situation that was not largely rectified until the Voting Rights Act of 1965.
Because a state’s number of electors is based on total population, not actual voters, it gives the states no incentive to enfranchise new groups of people, or to make voting easier for those eligible. And because states want to maximize their influence in selecting the president, they also have a strong incentive to use a winner-take-all approach to awarding electors, which all but two states currently do. The result — as we’ve now seen twice in the last two decades — is that a popular vote loser can be an Electoral College winner.
In a liberal democracy, not everything need be decided by majority vote. But once something is put to a vote, it is hard to understand why the side getting fewer votes should win. And Americans have long understood themselves to be voting for their president, not for presidential electors. It is long past time to get rid of the Electoral College.
by jese wingman
