1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
tester [92]
1 year ago
15

do you agree by that crime prevention could be answered only by one policing style,modell,approach, or strategy? yes or no.

Law
1 answer:
Murrr4er [49]1 year ago
5 0

No, crime prevention could not be answered only by one policing style, Model, approach, or strategy because there are varied crimes and all can not judge by one policing style, model, etc. Therefore in our constitutions varied laws, act and policies are mentioned.

What is crime prevention?

The first requirement of justice is prevention, 

"Crime prevention" refers to techniques and tactics aimed at lowering the likelihood that crimes will be committed, as well as their potentially damaging effects on people and society, including the fear of crime, by intervening to affect their various causes.

It takes a multi-sectoral, multi-disciplinary, and integrated effort to prevent crime.

There is clear evidence that well-planned crime prevention measures not only prevent crime and victimization, but also increase community safety and contribute to sustainable development of countries, the introduction to the Guidelines for the Prevention of Crime states. All citizens' lives are improved by effective, ethical crime prevention.

To know more about crime preventing, refer:

brainly.com/question/18258200

#SPJ9

You might be interested in
PLEASE HELP! CASHAPPING SOMEBODY WHO
djyliett [7]

Answer:

c

Explanation:

law enforcement fire a potentially used murder firearm into the water to preserve a gun tracing that is left on the bullet due to the barrels gratings into the bullet  

6 0
2 years ago
Think about coverage you’ve seen of high-profile crimes or court cases. What do you think is helpful about media coverage of the
Veseljchak [2.6K]

Answer: Encouraging the courts to make the right choice

Explanation:

Media coverage is beneficial in the sense that it can keep the American public informed on rulings that would fundamentally set the groundwork for future rulings. For example take the case of the State of Minnesota v. Derek Chauvin. This was a rare example of a police officer being punished for grave misdeeds.

Media coverage may put pressure on a court to make a right decision. However in some cases this can become problematic, swaying the jury one way or another and making them partial when they are to remain impartial.

7 0
2 years ago
What does the Supreme Court have the power to do?
Ipatiy [6.2K]

Answer:

A lot!

Explanation:

Supreme Court Background

Article III of the Constitution establishes the federal judiciary. Article III, Section I states that "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish." Although the Constitution establishes the Supreme Court, it permits Congress to decide how to organize it. Congress first exercised this power in the Judiciary Act of 1789. This Act created a Supreme Court with six justices. It also established the lower federal court system.

The Justices

Over the years, various Acts of Congress have altered the number of seats on the Supreme Court, from a low of five to a high of 10. Shortly after the Civil War, the number of seats on the Court was fixed at nine. Today, there is one Chief Justice and eight Associate Justices of the United States Supreme Court. Like all federal judges, justices are appointed by the President and are confirmed by the Senate. They, typically, hold office for life. The salaries of the justices cannot be decreased during their term of office. These restrictions are meant to protect the independence of the judiciary from the political branches of government.

The Court's Jurisdiction

Article III, Section II of the Constitution establishes the jurisdiction (legal ability to hear a case) of the Supreme Court. The Court has original jurisdiction (a case is tried before the Court) over certain cases, e.g., suits between two or more states and/or cases involving ambassadors and other public ministers. The Court has appellate jurisdiction (the Court can hear the case on appeal) on almost any other case that involves a point of constitutional and/or federal law. Some examples include cases to which the United States is a party, cases involving Treaties, and cases involving ships on the high seas and navigable waterways (admiralty cases).

Cases

When exercising its appellate jurisdiction, the Court, with a few exceptions, does not have to hear a case. The Certiorari Act of 1925 gives the Court the discretion to decide whether or not to do so. In a petition for a writ of certiorari, a party asks the Court to review its case. The Supreme Court agrees to hear about 100-150 of the more than 7,000 cases that it is asked to review each year.

Judicial Review

The best-known power of the Supreme Court is judicial review, or the ability of the Court to declare a Legislative or Executive act in violation of the Constitution, is not found within the text of the Constitution itself. The Court established this doctrine in the case of Marbury v. Madison (1803).

In this case, the Court had to decide whether an Act of Congress or the Constitution was the supreme law of the land. The Judiciary Act of 1789 gave the Supreme Court original jurisdiction to issue writs of mandamus (legal orders compelling government officials to act in accordance with the law). A suit was brought under this Act, but the Supreme Court noted that the Constitution did not permit the Court to have original jurisdiction in this matter. Since Article VI of the Constitution establishes the Constitution as the Supreme Law of the Land, the Court held that an Act of Congress that is contrary to the Constitution could not stand. In subsequent cases, the Court also established its authority to strike down state laws found to be in violation of the Constitution.

Before the passage of the Fourteenth Amendment (1869), the provisions of the Bill of Rights were only applicable to the federal government. After the Amendment's passage, the Supreme Court began ruling that most of its provisions were applicable to the states as well. Therefore, the Court has the final say over when a right is protected by the Constitution or when a Constitutional right is violated.

Role

The Supreme Court plays a very important role in our constitutional system of government. First, as the highest court in the land, it is the court of last resort for those looking for justice. Second, due to its power of judicial review, it plays an essential role in ensuring that each branch of government recognizes the limits of its own power. Third, it protects civil rights and liberties by striking down laws that violate the Constitution. Finally, it sets appropriate limits on democratic government by ensuring that popular majorities cannot pass laws that harm and/or take undue advantage of unpopular minorities. In essence, it serves to ensure that the changing views of a majority do not undermine the fundamental values common to all Americans, i.e., freedom of speech, freedom of religion, and due process of law.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The federal government has many agencies and commissions in place just to watch their own federal workforce.
SSSSS [86.1K]

Answer: See explanation

Explanation:

Office of Personnel Management - This office is responsible for the management of the civil service and is also responsible for employing new employees and managing their pensions and other retirement benefits.

The also ensure that insurance are provided to the government workers.

Merit System Protection Board - This ensures that there's an efrwctice and efficient workforce. It also ensures that excellent services are given to the citizens by the workers.

Office of the Government Ethics: It is charged with the responsibility of overseeing and guiding the government employees and ensuring that ethic laws are been maintained. It ensures that conflict of interest among employees are prevented.

These agencies are important because they ensure that the aims of the government are met through the provision of necessary materials to ensure improvement in workers productivity and conditions and also monitoring of employees to ensure that the goals of the government are met.

8 0
3 years ago
DRIVERS ED
sashaice [31]
I think it’s momentum or weight. Although momentum seems most likely since it’s a physics question.
7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Outline the process by which most federal judges are nominated and approved
    14·1 answer
  • How do lobbyist affect voters? Minimum 3 paragraphs
    5·1 answer
  • What was the subject of the most debate between large and small states at the constitutional convention?
    12·2 answers
  • A. If you were the Garrett family's attorney, what arguments would you make at the trial? What
    8·1 answer
  • Men convicted of crimes of passion have ____brain levels
    7·2 answers
  • The rules an agency within the executive branch makes are called:
    6·1 answer
  • 1. what is public opinion ?
    14·1 answer
  • ¿ en que consiste el código electoral ?
    10·1 answer
  • On April 16, 1982, at 10 pm Ray Johnson and his eight-year-old son David were waiting for a "walk" signal before crossing a stre
    7·2 answers
  • As an 18 year old in Alabama I know that the age majority is 19, and I can't drop out of high school without parent permission b
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!