All categories

3 years ago

Is death penalty moral or immoral?

Law

2 answers:

Snowcat [4.5K]3 years ago

8 0

It is moral because it is peaceful

zalisa [80]3 years ago

3 0

Answer:

The fact is that the death penalty, like limb-chopping or stoning, is a morally outrageous practice whatever its deterrent effect: it reduces society to the ethical level of the murderer. In a society that aspires to be moral and just, there is no room for such a state-sanctioned uncivilized practice.

Explanation:

Capital Punishment in the United States

In 1972, the United States Supreme Court suspended the imposition of the death penalty, finding it unconstitutional because it was imposed disproportionately on minorities and the poor. ... Many proponents of the death penalty argue that it deters criminals from killing.

You might be interested in

Maintaining the security of crime scene photographs is vitally important. Every time photographs change possession, the name of

IrinaVladis [17]

Answer:

For people who were at the original crime scene, forensic photos will help refresh their memory as time goes by. People who could not be present at the original crime scene, it provides them with the opportunity to see the crime scene and the evidence within the crime scene.

Explanation:

Hope this helps

-A Helping Friend

5 0

3 years ago

A violent and demeaning form of abuse in a romantic relationship is called

NARA [144]

Answer:

intimate terrorism

Explanation:

An intimate terrorism can be referred to as the presence of physical assault by a relationship partner; the partners could be a current partner or an ex partner.

The physical assault is in such a way that varieties of tactics are used to maintain control over the other person in the relationship

As mentioned earlier, intimate terrorism involved physical assaults and it can assume any of the following forms; it could be physical, verbal, emotional, economic and sexual abuse.

5 0

4 years ago

Where does the National Government draw its power from?

Wittaler [7]

The National Government gains it's power through the constitution.

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which argument is true for the classical theory of criminology

Oksana_A [137]

Answer:

The question is incomplete. These are the claims of the Classical Theory of Criminology;

The first basic claim made by the classical theory of crime causation is that human beings are fundamentally rational, and most human behavior is the result of free will and rational choice.

The classical theory believes that crime is a result of pain and pleasure which are the two central determinants of human behavior.

The classical theory of crime causation is that to deter law violators punishment must be meted accordingly to serve as an example to others who would also violate this law.

The classical theory of crime causation also believes that it cannot be denied that the root principles of right and wrong are in the nature of things.

Also according to the classical theory, crime is an immoral behavior degrades the relationship quality that exists between individuals and society.

Explanation:

The classical theory is a school of thought popular in 18th century Europe. It believes that criminals were rational and that the severity of legal punishment should be restricted to the degree necessary for deterrence.

There are five key principles to understanding the classical school of thought. They are; Rationality, Hedonism, punishment and human rights

5 0

3 years ago

Do you think the punishment for people who are in a position of authority (such as teachers, coaches, preachers) should be harsh

irina1246 [14]

Answer:

yes

Explanation:

I think that their punishment should be harsher because they are expected to do the right thing in the positions that are given to them so if they disobey they should be punish severely because they are not above the law.

6 0

4 years ago