1. The answer is B) Many people would run and the winner would be elected with a relatively small percentage of the vote.With the nominating step, each party could only send one pair of president and vice president candidate for the election. Without the nomination process, all parties could send more than one pair of canidate whicch will cause confusion among the voters
2. The answer is C. It offers a stinging criticism of the other party's presidential nominee This type of behavior is called negative campaign. This criticism is used to damage a certain candidate's among the potential voters bybadmouthing other candidates during the rally
3.The answer is B) the ability to raise moneyBy front-loading the campaign, the campaign manager will obtain a considerable amount of money to attract donors and obtain enough fund to sustain the remaining days of the campaign.
Answer:
Ok then... weird assignment... but i'm trying to rank up... if you would give me one that would be aprecated... thank you
Explanation: my old account got deleted by my younger cousin
Answer: <u><em>Fast mapping</em></u>
Answer:
double-barreled question
Explanation:
A double-barreled question is a question that comprises two or more topics or issues , but is expected to have just one answer. A double barreled question is sometimes referred to as an informal fallacy. It also be called a double-direct question or compound question. It is usually advisable to avoid such questions in survey, but can be used in court during cross examination or other researches.
For example the question above touches on two separate issues: the use of reinforcement and the use of punishment at the same time, by parents, as a means to increase the likelihood of desirable behaviors in their children. Stacy found it difficult to answer this question because it is a double-barreled question.
I believe the answer is B. <span>sound bites in the media.
Sound bites in the media refers to the short phrases that summarize what the speaker have to say.
Even though sound bites often used in meda interview, it wouldn't played any role in interpreting judicial decisions.</span>
