Answer:
c. loses some, but not all, of its customers as your answer loses some, but not all, of its customers
Explanation:
In a monopolistically competitive product is a product that has competition in the market, but that are not quite the same product, meaning they can´t be exactly replaced by a cheaper or different brand, when a company like that rises its prices, it eventually ends up loosing some clients, but not all, because of the loyal clients and those that can´t or won´t change brands, a good example of a monopolistically competitive firm, would be Apple, which has a loyal base of costumers that eventhough prices of apple products have been rising are still loyal, they are loosing some customers to other brands but not all of them.
"research industry standards" is the answer i believe
The type of culture that Rahals built was clan culture, when the owners, work to encourage unity to increase their employees' job satisfaction and commitment.
<h3>What is clan culture?</h3>
A clan culture can be regarded as a tribe-like type of corporate environment which believe in
commonality of goals and values.
Clan cultures usually appears as collaborative and the least competitive of the main corporate culture models.
Learn more about culture at;
brainly.com/question/25010777
Answer:
Yes, Tangshan Mining company should accept the project.
Explanation:
Payback period is the number of years it takes for a project's expected cash inflows to recover the initial investment amount.
Tangshan company's required payback period = 3.5 years
<u>Year CF Net CF</u>
0 -5,000,000 -5,000,000
1 1,800,000 -3,200,000
2 1,900,000 -1,300,000
3 700,000 -600,000
4 1,800,000 1,200,000
<em>Payback period = last year with -net CF +(absolute net CF that year /total CF the following year)</em>
Payback period = 3 + (600,000 / 1,800,000)
=3 + 0.33
= 3.33 years
Since 3.33 years is lower than the required payback period of 3.5 years, Tangshan Mining company should ACCEPT the new project; it will take less years to fully recover the initial amount investment.
Answer:
Explanation: A. Shadow price has not changed because Shadow price show value of a commodity without considering final cost.
B. Change in value 180 - 150/180 X 100 = 16.7
C. The optimal solution didn't change because the product price went from it highest profit 180 to it's least cost 150
