Question

in baker v. carr (1962), the supreme court ruled that a state legislature would have to redraw their representative districts in order to comply with the constitution. which of the following potential difficulties could have resulted from this decision?

Answer 1

The state legislature could have refused to implement the decision, leading to a crisis in the legitimacy of the Supreme Court's authority.

Baker v. Carr (1962) is the U.S. Preferred court docket case that held that federal courts should hear cases alleging that a state's drawing of electoral obstacles, i.E. Redistricting, violates the identical safety Clause of the Fourteenth modification of the charter.

Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962), became a landmark USA ideal court docket case in which the court held that redistricting qualifies as a justiciable question beneath the Fourteenth Amendment, therefore enabling federal courts to hear Fourteenth amendment-based totally redistricting instances.

Learn more about legislature here brainly.com/question/809346

#SPJ4