The answer is cost benefit analysis.
Cost-benefit analysis, also known as benefit-cost analysis, is a methodical process for determining the advantages and disadvantages of potential solutions.
What is cost benefit analysis?
- Comparing expected or estimated costs and benefits (or opportunities) connected with a project choice in order to assess if it makes sense from a business perspective is the process of a cost-benefit analysis.
- A CBA can be used to compare completed or potential courses of action and to estimate or evaluate the value against the cost of a decision, project, or policy.
- It is used to decide which options provide the best approach to achieving benefits while preserving savings in, for example, transactions, activities, and functional business requirements.
- It is frequently used to assess commercial deals, project investments, and judgments about business or policy (especially public policy). Consider the U.S.
- Before enacting laws or deregulating existing ones, the Securities and Exchange Commission must perform cost-benefit analyses.
To learn more about cost benefit analysis visit:brainly.com/question/199821
#SPJ4
Answer:
Check below for the answers and explanations
Explanation:
1) Standing is the process of examining the right of a plaintiff to take a lawsuit to the court of law.
Standing is important to ensure that the case brought to court is actually a dispute and not a contempt from an aggrieved party. It also ensures that the innocent is not unlawfully punished.
2) Sierra Club could have had a standing to file the lawsuit if it had an evidence or a likelihood of being injured or harmed
3) The Sierra club case led to the birth of a dissent that environmental objects should be regarded as persons in ecological matters.
4)The case did not have standing because it was filed by an organization and this conflicts with the Animal Welfare Act which stated that individuals and organizations do not have standing to file a lawsuit in a court.
5) Mr Jurnove, a worker of the Animal Legal Defence Fund was able to provide a substantial claim of the injuries he suffered when he saw the ill treatment the animals were subjected to by USDA.
Though other plaintiffs do not have standing, as far as one of them does, it will not be considered whether or not the others have standing. Therefore, the plaintiff had standing.
6) None of the plaintiffs that were acting on behalf of the dolphin met the requirement of "Injury in fact", a necessary requirement to have standing. None of them could give evidences of the injuries suffered as a result of the act by The New England Aquarium.
Answer:
To issue a judgement after looking at all the evidences in a calm and rational manner, and then renders an unbiased opinion.
Explanation:
The criminal justice system is a series of government agencies and institutions. Goals include the rehabilitation of offenders, preventing other crimes, and moral support for victims. The primary institutions of the criminal justice system are the police, prosecution and defense lawyers, the courts and prisons.
I believe the answer is d because if the majority of each is the same party they will likely hold similar views
Answer:
A rebuttable presumption is assumed true until a person proves otherwise (for example the presumption of innocence). In contrast, a conclusive (or irrebuttable) presumption cannot be refuted in any case (such as defense of infancy in some legal systems).Explanation:
