Answer:
The genotypes found in the F2 offspring will be An1An1, An1An2 and An2An2.
Explanation:
In the example given in the question, the color of the petals of snapdragon flowers are given with the An1 allele having full activity and the An2 allele being the null allele. For the F1 offspring, two snapdragon flowers are crossed, one with red petals which is An1An1 and one with ivory petals which is An2An2. All the genotypes for the F1 offspring will result in An1An2.
Then using this F1 offspring, the F2 offspring is found and the genotype of the F2 offspring will be An1An1 / An1An2 / An1An2 / An2An2.
So the genotypes found in the F2 offspring will be An1An1, An1An2 and An2An2. One red petal snapdragon, 1 ivory snapdragon and 2 pink snapdragons.
I hope this answer helps.
Answer:
The half-life of a substance is the amount of time it takes for half of that substance to decay. However, after two half-lives, half of the half remaining will decay, leaving you with one quarter of the original substance.
So, after 1 million years you will have 50% of the original substance remaining.
And, after 2 million years you will have 25% of the original substance remaining.
After 3 million years you will have 12.5% of the original substance remaining.
And after 4 million years you will have 6.25% of the original substance remaining.
Explanation:
Hope it helps:)
In this question, there are no options given to choose from. So i would answer this question based on my knowledge. The most likely cause of the observed variation is adaptation and evolution. The birds of that island adapted to the food source and then they evolved as per the requirement of the place and food source.
It is practical knowledge in the sense that we know why some parts of the world are inherently risky to live in. Even though volcanic eruptionis, earthquakes and tsunamis are difficult to predict, it makes sense to have building codes and emergency plans that take this into account.
It is science’s response to the beliefs that natural catastrophes (volcanism, earthquakes and tsunamis) are divine punishments for the evil ways of some individuals.
Even if you will never use or apply this knowledge, knowing about the theory of plate tectonics gives you a current scientific perspective on what we know about the natural world.
It is a good example of how scientific theories proceed by trying to fit several observations into a coherent explanation.
Learning about the observations that needed to be made and explained for the theory to win over scientists helps caution you against people who adopt belief systems without questioning the myths told to them, or those who try to profit from ignorance of how nature actually works.
When it is well taught, it should convince you that, like any scientific theory, plate tectonics is a “work in progress”. New discoveries continue to be made, and it takes creative and logical thinking, debate and a quest for more observations in order to determine which ones prove or challenge the current theory and which ones may lead to its refinement.
