Answer: Yes they did.
Explanation:
Apparent Authority refers to a scenario where a Agent is assumed to have the power to act on behalf of a Principal regardless of if said authority had not being expressly given whether implicitly or otherwise.
It is worthy of note that this power is only valid if the third party in the transaction assumes from the conduct of the agent, that they have such powers to act.
It is stated in the text that there was no question that the brokers had the actual or implied authority to sell the stock meaning that the Principal had not done enough to show that the agents did not have the Authority to act as they did. For this reason, they can indeed be sued under the Principle of Apparent Authority.
B) boycott
I remember learning about it in the 5th grade
In porter's generic competitive strategies, <u>focus strategy </u>and <u>overall cost</u> <u>leadership </u>strategy combines a focus on a total market scope and a competitive cost advantage respectively.
<h3>What is focus strategy?</h3>
A focus strategy is a competitive tactic used to target marketing and sales at a certain market niche. Utilizing underserved or untapped markets is the goal of this technique.
While many rivals want to reach as many clients as possible with their sales, a focus approach chooses one or more certain categories. It gains an advantage by providing that sector with either high quality or low cost. These actions may improve client loyalty.
There are primarily two categories of focus strategies. One aspires to outperform the competition by cost leaders, while the other wants to succeed by differentiation itself.
Learn more about Focus strategy
brainly.com/question/15173066
#SPJ4
The answer your problem is C
My answer is contemplation
