Measures the value that a buyer places on a good
Answer:
The correct answer is: Retaining a higher percentage of earnings will result in a lower growth rate.; Long-run earnings growth will decrease when firms retain earnings and reinvest them in the business.
Explanation:
In the first statement, a deliberate action is shown that consists of the capitalization of the entity, that is, the equity is accumulated in order to distribute it among the shareholders and leave a part to support the company. In the second statement, it means that the positive results of the company will not be seen in the long term due to management's dispositions to execute a policy to capitalize the entity and improve its cash flow by reinvesting the perceived resources.
Answer:
$231,140
Explanation:
The computation of the amount reported in the cost of goods sold is shown below:
= Number of pool cues sold × total manufacturing cost per pool cue
where,
Number of pool cues sold would be 26,000 pool cues
And, the total manufacturing cost per pool cue would be
= Direct Materials per cue + Direct manufacturing Labor per cue + Manufacturing Overhead per cue
= $2 + $6 + $0.89
= $8.89
Now put these values to the above formula
So, the value would be equal to
= 26,000 cues × 8.89
= $231,140
Answer:
The correct answer is "Face-to-face interviews".
Explanation:
- Face-to-face surveys or interviews are an important way of gathering information used throughout survey methodology.
- Throughout these interviews, research teams are collecting location information from participants across one cooperation or bonding. This method of collecting information seems to be unique or even just highly personalized.
Answer:
The answer is "Whenever a court requires him to use the res ipsa loquitur doctrine, he possibly would succeed".
Explanation:
Res ipsa loquitur is also an English common law doctrine which claims in an action for tort, throughout the absence of direct proof on whether any defendant acted, a jury may conclude neglect of the nature of an illness or incident. It is used in circumstances in which the complainant is not presented sufficient proof that the offender is not liable.
