1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kakasveta [241]
1 year ago
5

Why did England want to imperialize India?How did British rule of India impact Indians?How did England gain control in India ?

Social Studies
2 answers:
gulaghasi [49]1 year ago
6 0

Answer: As India addressed predominantly two major duties within industrial England

One being, the raw materials where India was seen by the British officials as a primary source supply fuel for the factories.

The other being, agricultural resources as the Indian economy was largely centered around agriculture, which would then be exported to England.

Major Impacts of British Rule in India

To improve the condition of women in society, various legal measures were introduced

Issues like Sati, Child Marriages, and Infanticides come to a stop

The British authorities built many important infrastructures such as hospital schools and the most important of all, railways, the introduction of new technology like steamships, telegraphs, and trains completely changed the economic landscape, modern education began in India under British rule before the British, India had its educational systems like the Gurukuls.

Explanation; The complicated relationship between Britain and India began with the formation of the East India Company in 1600 the British East India Company made its sneaky entry through the Indian port of Surat in 1608. Slowly as they expanded their trade operations, the British started forming colonies. Penetrating deep into Indian politics, India was once referred to as "The Golden Bird" before the British looters drained all its wealth. At the beginning of the 18th century, India's share of the world economy was 23 percent, as large as all of Europe put together, but by the time the British were kicked out of India in 1947, it had dropped to less than 4 percent, As time progressed, Indians felt that they were owed independence.

To know more about the British rule over India

https://www.gcsnc.com/cms/lib/NC01910393/Centricity/Domain/5457/Imperialism%20in%20India%20PP%20.pptx

sattari [20]1 year ago
3 0

Answer: As India was the major source of raw materials for all England industries like agriculture, import-export.

Explanation:

India was seen by Britain as a potential supplier of raw materials to supply England's manufacturing. The economy of India at the time was heavily based on agriculture.

Because the British modernized and industrialized India, the lack of financial benefits from their rule caused many economic declines in India, and Indians developed a sense of nationalism after the British took control of the country, So, there were both positive and negative impacts.

King Charles II of England granted the British East India Company the freedom to govern their Indian holdings as they saw fit around 1670. He granted them authority over the production of money, the direction of armies and fortresses, the formation of alliances, the conduct of war and peace, and the imposition of laws within their own domains.

To learn more about British rule in India-

brainly.com/question/28320113

brainly.com/question/9667740

You might be interested in
Simone is severely depressed and believes that she has no control over her environment, that no matter how hard she works on som
PSYCHO15rus [73]
I believe the answer is: Low degree of self-efficacyLow degree of self-efficacy refers to the psychological condition that cause someone to have little to no belief about their ability to solve the problems that they face. This type of behavior would most likely make people discourage to even interrat with simone and would sink him further into his depression
7 0
3 years ago
What is the best tips you give me to make my pictures better?
mamaluj [8]
You’re kidding right?
6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is it called when one family rules over a country for many generations?
romanna [79]
Is it dynasty? im not sure though
3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Isn't it a bit ironic that executives found guilty of criminal activity could serve less time in prison if their firm has develo
lisov135 [29]

Answer? 1) Yes, it is a bit ironic. If a company has an Ethics program that's comprehensive enough, executives should not have to be caught in business criminal activities.

2.) First let's talk about Ethics programs. These are basically programs that embody the business philosophies of a company such that every stakeholder understand how business is run in the company. It basically defines to employees, staff, investors, vendors and customers the rules of Business Ethics as defined by the firm, from the maximum amount of tips to collect from customers to how intimate employees get with clients so that there's no confusion. Now, all this is to clarify but the question here is how effective was the program if criminal activity was discovered? It's simple. The most comprehensive Ethics programs can't control human circumstantial behaviour. As clear as rules may be, they are always still broken. And this is because, with humans, there an infinite number of things to put into consideration, most of which won't always follow rules. One may be 100% compliant with said rules but find themselves weak to give in at some point for any possible reason the person deemed more important than upholding the companies ethics. In other words, these rules are held by the people it binds and the delivery will always be subjective. Whenever it is deemed unfavorable to uphold, it most likely will be dropped.

Therefore, it might have been the most effective and comprehensive Ethics program in the world but only as effective as the executives demmed it subjectively.

8 0
3 years ago
Which article of the Constitution created the judicial branch as a separate body from the executive and legislative branches?
-Dominant- [34]
The Judicial Branch was created in Article III of the Constitution.  C is the correct answer.
3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which president did not contribute to the progressive movement throughout the early 1900s?
    10·1 answer
  • Intuition often leads us to believe that extroverted people who can speak coherently about their goals and their jobs are more l
    13·1 answer
  • How did the rise of Hitler and the Nazis cause world war 2
    7·1 answer
  • Which perspective most clearly emphasizes that the development of personality is partially learned through conditioning and imit
    10·1 answer
  • 10. Define: history​
    15·1 answer
  • Europe is directly to the ____of africa
    6·2 answers
  • Why did dial-up modems make strange screeching sounds?
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following South American regions has a name that means “high plain”?
    10·1 answer
  • Dylan sees Coach Connor as a bully. Coach Connor seems himself as a motivational trainer and mentor. Dylan and Connor have diffe
    11·1 answer
  • Nelson mandela's inaugural address reflects his belief that
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!