Answer:
Personality conflict
Explanation:
Personality conflict occurs between two people when there is conflict due to the different personalities of the people.
The incompatibility of the personalities causes this conflict. This type of conflict can be mitigated by the some of the following ways:
Know what part of the other person's personality you dislike.
Give the other person a chance to take actions so that you can develop positive feelings towards them.
Try to understand the other person's perspective.
You can carry out research on reliable sources to identify what life was like in Jamestown, using the social, economic and political characteristics of the colony to produce your illustration.
<h3 /><h3>What was life like in Jamestown?</h3>
Jamestown corresponds to the first English settlement in America being considered the capital of the colony, it was located in Virginia.
In the 1600s, life in Jamestown was difficult, with high rates of violence, insecurity, lack of resources and diseases, and the first settlers found it difficult to settle in the place, where climatic and soil conditions were unfavorable for agriculture and subsistence.
Therefore, the period that comprises the years 1609 and 1610, became known as the <em>"Time of the Famine"</em> in Jamestown, which, due to the scarcity of resources, caused most of the settlers to die due to the precariousness of living conditions.
Find out more about Jamestown here:
brainly.com/question/6700105
#SPJ1
Schools are agents of socialization that not only teach us subject knowledge and life skills but also social skills through our interactions with teachers, staff, and other students.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
An adversary system is a legal system used in the common law countries where two advocates represent their parties' case or position before an impartial person or group of people
<span>There's not really any pros for propaganda because essentially what you are doing is lying to get someone to believe something. I guess you could say a pro is that gullible people will believe you, but that's an unethical pro. The cons are that it usually causes much controversy in a society where there's not supposed to be a bias in the government. Propaganda in its true form is never a good thing. It is unethical in the sense that it takes advantage of people who are too lazy to do research and quick to believe what someone tells them. One example I like to use is many of these independent "news" websites. On both ends of the political spectrum, left and right, you find websites that have articles so heavily weighed down with that wings propaganda that true news becomes less and less visible. Occupy Democrats is one textbook example of that. Their articles are so left leaning that you read an article and are immediately left with a left leaning impression. Same goes for a lot of right wing websites. I'm not going to say "always" but propaganda 99.9 percent of the time is not good. Instead of people doing their own research to decide their view on something, propaganda </span>tells<span> people what they should think versus the </span><span>asking </span><span>people what they think</span>
