1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Zigmanuir [339]
1 year ago
7

Which explanation most likely accounts for the increase in the number of male butterflies in the five years after the initial pa

rasite problem?.
Business
1 answer:
Stells [14]1 year ago
6 0

The explanation most likely accounts for the increase in the number of male butterflies after the initial parasite problem is that male butterflies in the population survived had a gene that made them resistant to the parasite, as well as the gene, that was passed to their offspring.

So, the correct option is C.

A population's size might alter due to the occurrence of new people or species. The total number of living things that are present in a given habitat is referred to as its population. The scenario indicates that there are now considerably more men in the population. The male butterflies in the population that survived earlier had a gene making them resistant to the parasite, and they passed the gene on to their offspring, leading to the number of males to be increased in the population.

This increase in the number of population growth of males can be explained by the fact that the male butterflies in the population that survived earlier had a gene making them resistant to the parasite, and they passed the gene to their offspring.

Learn to know more about Parasite on

brainly.com/question/22589174

#SPJ4

The given question is incomplete. The complete question is:

A few years ago the population of male blue moon butterflies on the island of Samoa declined. One hypothesis for the decline of the male butterflies is that a parasite-infected the cells of female butterflies. The parasite was passed to offspring through the females’ eggs and killed the male butterfly embryos. At one point during the decline, nearly all the butterflies in the population were females, but after five years the number of males in the population increased significantly.

Which explanation most likely accounts for the increase in the number of male butterflies in the five years after the initial parasite problem?

A. Male butterflies in the population that survived were able to prey on the parasites living in the females’ egg cells.

B. Female butterflies in the population that survived had a genetic adaptation that allowed them to transform into male butterflies.

C. Male butterflies in the population that survived had a gene that made them resistant to the parasite, and they passed the gene on to their offspring.

D. Female butterflies in the population that survived were able to protect the male eggs from the parasite and provide extra care for the male offspring.

You might be interested in
A small business decides to upgrade its aging phone system. the business will probably place a straight rebuy order.
natulia [17]
False.
The business wants to upgrade the phone system, not rebuy the same one.
8 0
3 years ago
MacHeath Inc. bought 60% of the outstanding common stock of Nomes Inc. in an acquisition that resulted in the recognition of goo
kiruha [24]

Answer:

c) $600,000.

Explanation:

$600,000.00 is the value that will be attributed to land in a consolidated balance sheet at the date of acquisition?

In the acquisition process,  assets and liabilities of the business being bought get evaluated to ascertain their true worth.  Assets such as land, buildings, and machinery undergo valuation. Their market value or fair value is recorded in the books of the acquiring entity as the actual value of the asset at the time of acquisition.

8 0
3 years ago
Gerardi Supply started the year with total assets of $210,000 and total liabilities of $85,000. During the year, the business re
ivanzaharov [21]

Answer:

$155.000

Explanation:

According with the information the person has first calculate the Equity. According with the accounting equation the Assets are equal to Liabilities plus the Equity. The first step is found the equity of the next way:

Equity year 1= Assets- Liabilities  

Equity year 1= $210,000 - $85,000

Equity year 1= $125.000

Equity year 1= 125.000- 50.000 (dividends) = $75.000  

Nevertheless, the calculation of the net income is measure independent of the operations in the balance sheet.  

After you need to calculate the net income:

Net income= Revenues- Expenses  

Net income= $275,000- $120,000

Net income= $155.000

As you can see the operations in the income statement only affects are affects by the revenue and the expenses.

7 0
3 years ago
Ballou Corporation declared a cash dividend on December 13, 2018, payable on January 10, 2019. By mistake, the company failed to
crimeas [40]

Answer: a. retained earnings was overstated and liabilities were understated.

Explanation:

Dividends are paid from the Retained Earnings so when a company announces a dividend, that dividend is to be deducted from the Retained earnings. As this was not done, the Retained earnings at year end are overstated.

As the dividends are not paid immediately, they become liabilities. With the relevant entries not made, the dividends were not recorded as liabilities which makes liabilities understated.

3 0
3 years ago
Two firms, A and B, each currently emit 100 tons of chemicals into the air. The government has decided to reduce the pollution a
LekaFEV [45]

Answer:

It is likely that <em>C. Firm A will buy all of Firm B's pollution permits. Each one will cost between $100 and $200</em>.

Explanation:

  • So <em>two firms, A and B, each currently emit 100 tons</em><em> of chemicals into the air, and from now on each one will require </em><em>a pollution permit for each ton</em><em> of pollution emitted into the air</em>.
  • <em>Each firm gets 40 pollution permits</em><em>, which it can</em><em> either use or sell </em><em>to the other firm</em>. That means that if both firms choose to keep their respective 40 permits, they would still have to reduce the pollution by 60 tons (100 minus 40 is 60).
  • <em>It costs Firm A $200 for each ton of pollution that it eliminates</em><em> before it is emitted into the air</em>. Because it costs so much to eliminate a ton of pollution, it would make sense for Firm A to get as many pollution permits as possible, <u>as long as they get them for less than $200 each</u>.
  • It costs Firm B $100 for each ton of pollution that it eliminates before it is emitted into the air. Since here it costs less to eliminate a ton of pollution, it would make sense for Firm B to sell as many pollution permits as possible, <u>as long as they sell for higher than $100</u>.

With that in mind, the outcome that makes the most sense would be <em>Option C. Firm A will buy all of Firm B's pollution permits. Each one will cost between $100 and $200</em>. This way both firms spend the least amount of money while at the same time pleasing the government.

To demonstrate it, let's do some actual calculations for each case.

Case A) Both firms will use their own pollution permits.

In this case, each firm will have to independently reduce their pollutants by 60 tons, as noted before. That represents a high cost, as we will now determine:

For Firm A, the cost would be

60tons*200\frac{dollars}{ton}=12000dollars

For Firm B, the cost would be

60tons*100\frac{dollars}{ton}=6000dollars

Case B) Firm A will buy some of Firm B's pollution permits. Each one will cost less than $100.

Since Firm B could spend $100 to reduce a ton of pollution, it wouldn't sell its pollution permits for less than $100 each: <em>If Firm B sold its pollution permits for less than $100 each, it would have to reduce even more tons of pollutants (spending $100 for each one), and </em><em>would end up losing money</em>! Let's say it sold 10 pollution permits for $90 each, so it would have to reduce 70 tons of pollutants instead of 60. Its total cost would be:

Cost for Firm B (Case B):

70tons*100\frac{dollars}{ton}-(10*90dollars)=6100dollars

Which is higher than the cost calculated for Firm B in Case A, so it's not worth it.

Case D) Firm B will buy all of Firm A's pollution permits. Each one will cost between $100 and $200.

This is a similar case than Case B, in the sense that since it costs Firm A so much to reduce a ton of pollutant ($200 for each one), it wouldn't sell its pollution permits for less than $200 each, <em>or it would end up losing money as well</em>. Let's say Firm A sold all of its 40 pollution permits for $150 each, and so it would have to reduce 100 tons of pollutants instead of 60. Its total cost would be:

Cost for Firm A (Case D):

100tons*200\frac{dollars}{ton}-(40*150dollars)=14000dollars

Which is higher than the cost calculated for Firm A in Case A, so it's not worth it.

Finally, Case C) Firm A will buy all of Firm B's pollution permits. Each one will cost between $100 and $200.

As mentioned before, this one makes the most sense because both firms would spend the least amount of money. Let's determine the total costs for each one, knowing that:

  • Firm A would buy 40 pollutant permits from Firm B, for (let's say) $150 each.
  • Firm A would still need to reduce 20 tons of pollutants. And
  • Firm B would have to reduce 100 tons of pollutants, instead of 60.

Cost for Firm A (Case C):

(20tons*200\frac{dollars}{ton})+(40*150dollars)=10000dollars

Which is less than the $12000 Cost calculated in Case A.

Cost for Firm B (Case C):

(100tons*100\frac{dollars}{ton})-(40*150dollars)=4000dollars

Which is less than the $6000 Cost calculated in Case A.

<em>Since both firms each spend $2000 less in Case C than in case A, it would make sense for them to follow this option</em>.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Demand for food doesn't change in response to a change in price. Why? 
    8·2 answers
  • On the Budget Challenge Cash Flow Spreadsheet (CFS) (this file is downloadable on the "How to Play" page of the website), what c
    12·1 answer
  • What is one main objective in the studies of economics
    8·2 answers
  • An increase in the price of poultry would lead to__________
    5·1 answer
  • Jake is leaving Shoe Warehouse to open his own shoe boutique. Jake currently earns $40,000 a year at Shoe Warehouse, but he is e
    11·1 answer
  • Be careful with a ________ strategy. Because price is a cue for developing customer perceptions of product quality, the value pr
    13·1 answer
  • 25,000 shares reacquired by Elixir Corporation for $53 per share were exchanged for undeveloped land that has an appraised value
    10·1 answer
  • Computech Corporation is expanding rapidly and currently needs to retain all of its earnings; hence, it does not pay dividends.
    6·1 answer
  • What is my level of education if I just finished 10th grade?
    7·2 answers
  • jose owns a dog whose barking annoys jose's neighbor jane. suppose that the benefit of owning the dog is worth $100 to jose and
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!