Answer:
Court ruled over in favor of the plaintiffs.
Explanation:
The result was that the court ruled in the favor of the plaintiffs because the contractor was statutorily barred from bringing an action to enforce payment because he doesn't has the residential home builder license and the amount of the contract satisfied statutory requirements.
Answer:
8448.22
Explanation:
We are asked to calculate the present value of 20,000 in ten years.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4b73c/4b73c1d734145b4f83715220a4a322a71d6532ee" alt="\frac{amount}{ {(1 + rate)}^{time} } = present \: value"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c5d46/c5d465ac263a6b69e9552e465bc476206d7c7b9b" alt="\frac{20000}{ {(1 + 0.12)}^{10} } = 8448.22"
<em>Resuming: </em>in this kind of problems we are asked for which lump sum becomes a certain amount in a given period of time at an annual rate
Answer:
Total value of the investment= $57,320.73
Explanation:
<u>First, we need to calculate the future value of the first part of the investment. We will calculate the future value for the monthly deposit for five years and then the lump sum for another five years.</u>
FV= {A*[(1+i)^n-1]}/i
A= monthly deposit
i= 0.04/12= 0.003333
n= 5*12= 60 months
FV= {322*[(1.003333^60) - 1]} / 0.003333
FV= $21,348.05
<u>For the lump sum:</u>
FV= PV*(1+i)^n
n= 12*5= 60
i= 0.05/12= 0.004167
FV= 21,348.05*(1.004167^60)
FV= $27,397.75
<u>Now, the future value of the second part of the investment:</u>
<u></u>
n= 60
i= 0.0041667
A= 440
FV= {440*[(1.004167^60) - 1]} / 0.004167
FV= $29,922.98
Total value of the investment= 27,397.75 + 29,922.98
Total value of the investment= $57,320.73
<span>Because it focuses on processes that transform data into useful information, structured analysis is called a Process centered technique
Process centered technique is a designing methodology that being done by company to determine the best possible User Interface to be provided for the customers</span>
Answer:
Option (E) is correct.
Explanation:
For utility maximization,
Bob's consumption of Housing and food should be such that:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c08c1/c08c14fb37f6e8a2e3609d9b73246e5c3711cce7" alt="\frac{Marginal\ utility\ of\ housing}{Price\ of\ housing}=\frac{Marginal\ utility\ of\ food}{Price\ of\ food}"
Here,
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b3c3d/b3c3d1860e370f791d5ba1d7589f53cc94205bdf" alt="\frac{Marginal\ utility\ of\ housing}{Price\ of\ housing}=\frac{100}{2}"
= 50
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fddd/4fddd873e16b41e4218c8644a0a7251abfa0d7d6" alt="\frac{Marginal\ utility\ of\ food}{Price\ of\ food}=\frac{20}{1}"
=20
Bob is not maximizing utility, as these two terms are not equal(50 > 20).
Since the marginal utility per rupee spent on housing is greater than that on food.
Hence, Bob can increase his utility just by consuming more of housing and less of food.