Answer: Yes
Explanation: I dont have a clue
Answer: Confirmation bias
Explanation:
Confirmation bias is the method through which already-exiting personal believe is confirmed on basis of new evidence and data.This searched information in form of evidence favors and strengthens the belief of the person and thus it is considered appropriate.
According to the question, scenario of the investigation is describing about confirmation bias as due to extreme investigation done by Jared made the suspect falsely agree to the crime.In this way ,Jared got strength on the belief that suspect is the criminal because of the information(confession) he got from suspect.
Answer:
A precedent is something that precedes, or comes before. A precedent is a decision that is the support of an idea or reason for future decisions.
Explanation:
Hope this helps! Stay safe! :D
Answer:
The use of the term "ethical" sometimes is a bit too lax when applied to evaluate situations. However, sometimes, it can also be too harsh. In response to your two questions, these would be the answers:
1. The ethical question here would be whether Greedy was right in overusing a benefit that the charitable organization had with the First California Bank. As President of the organization, it is in the hands of Greedy to ensure not just development, but also sustainable development of the organization. However, in the course of his attempts to improve the growth and efficacy of Send Me Money, he abused the benefit of the overdraft, and not to just any extent, but to the negative balance of 10.000 dollars. Although his intentions were in favor of the organization, and he used the money wisely, there still lies the question of if he could not have accomplished just as much, without abusing a benefit that could very well mean the end of the organization. So the ethical issue is that although the intention of Greedy was in the benefit of the organization, he did not take the best interest of it into account, because if he had, he would have tried to accomplish his goals without bringing the debt so high.
2. I disapprove of the way that Bill Greedy acted because he could have accomplished much more realistic goals and not placed the organization at risk by raising the debt to a bank to such high levels. Even if he increased fundraising efforts, it is evident that these were not successful, as the debt is so high.
Answer:
selling goods to Asia
Explanation:
If you look these up on Quizlet the answers are there or you can look them up on a trustable social studies sight.
