The answer in the space provided is the chief of staff. The
chief of staff is responsible of leading a certain organization in which he or
she is the one responsible of having to deal with certain issues in support of the
one that it protects.
Answer:
Muir describes his traitorous journey he had to embark through the swamp and narrate how the trip was dangerous and uneasy. He uses words such as difficult, struggling, fear, extensive, crooked, brood heaps, faint, hungry and tangled to depicts the severity of the event. Muir uses diction with a negative connotation to elicit the fear and concern that he felt when he became worried whether or not he'd be able to make it out of the swamp before night.
Antoine Lavoisier is the scientist that said that matter is neither created nor destroyed.
<h3>Who was Antoine Lavoisier?</h3>
This is the name of the scientist who was a French Nobleman as well as a chemist. He was one of the persons that was central to the Chemical revolution that took place in the European continent. His discovery and science has a lot of influence on modern science and biology today.
Hence we can say that Antoine Lavoisier is the scientist that said that matter is neither created nor destroyed.
Read more on Antoine Lavoisier here: brainly.com/question/4345117
#SPJ1
Answer:
Family resemblance (German: Familienähnlichkeit) is a philosophical idea made popular by Ludwig Wittgenstein, with the best known exposition given in his posthumously published book Philosophical Investigations (1953).[1] It argues that things which could be thought to be connected by one essential common feature may in fact be connected by a series of overlapping similarities, where no one feature is common to all of the things. Games, which Wittgenstein used as an example to explain the notion, have become the paradigmatic example of a group that is related by family resemblances. It has been suggested that Wittgenstein picked up the idea and the term from Nietzsche, who had been using it, as did many nineteenth century philologists, when discoursing about language families.[2]
Explanation:
Answer:A is the answer
Explanation:The point of the doctrine was to separate the influence in which the United States and European powers would have .Europe and United states will have no intervention within the Western Hemisphere
