It depends on which course you're studying. Different nomads had different reasons. I'm sorry I wasn't able to give you a better answer.
Although many Americans may dislike the partisanship of political activity, politics is how the country <u>peacefully decides on policy.</u>
Politics is an essential part of life. In fact, it is what makes us human, according to Aristotle who defined man as ‘zoon politikon’ (political animal).
It is through politics that governments are set up, democracy is acted out, major laws and policy decisions are made, and socio-political differences ironed out. There are a variety of ways in which politics is institutionalized and lived in different societies.
In the United States, the form of representative democracy requires the existence of political parties. A two-party system has developed hence, comprising the Republican and Democratic Parties.
Partisanship has been an enduring concern, especially since ideological divides have seem to increase in recent years. Yet, it is through this system of doing politics that democracy continues to function and differences are mediated. It ensures peaceful process of formulating policies.
To learn more about Partisanship in America: brainly.com/question/750905
#SPJ4
So the type of democracy that engaged a door to door petition trying to get enough signatures for a proposal to be voted on by citizens is called Recall. I hope you are satisfied with my answer and feel free to ask for more if you have clarifications and questions.
The one time a scrum master may be a participant rather than a facilitator is when using ad-hoc teams for inspect and adapt.
<h3>What is the function of scrum master as a facilitator?</h3>
As a scrum master, he can serves as a facilitator to makes an action of learning process to be easy or easier.
But in some cases, whereby, there is a need of using ad-hoc teams for inspect and adapt, he can be a participant.
Learn more about facilitator at:brainly.com/question/25759088
#SPJ12
The Boston Port Act, the first of the laws passed in 1774 in response to the Boston Tea Party, closed the port of Boston until the colonists paid for the destroyed tea and until the king was satisfied that order had been restored. Colonists objected that the Port Act punished all of Boston rather than just the individuals who had destroyed the tea and that they were being punished without having been given an opportunity to testify in their own defense.
The Massachusetts Government Act provoked, even more, outrage than the Port Act because it unilaterally took away Massachusetts' charter and brought it under control of the British government. Under the terms of the Government Act, almost all positions in the colonial government were to be appointed by the governor, Parliament, or king. The act also severely limited the activities of town meetings in Massachusetts to one meeting a year, unless the Governor called for one. Colonists outside Massachusetts feared that their governments could now also be changed by the legislative fiat of Parliament.
The Administration of Justice Act allowed the Royal governor to order that trials of accused royal officials take place in Great Britain or elsewhere within the Empire if he decided that the defendant could not get a fair trial in Massachusetts. Although the act stipulated for witnesses to be reimbursed after having traveled at their own expense across the Atlantic, it was not stipulated that this would include reimbursement for lost earnings during the period for which they would be unable to work, leaving few with the ability to testify. George Washington called this the "Murder Act" because he believed that it allowed British officials to harass Americans and then escape justice. Many colonists believed the act was unnecessary because British soldiers had been given a fair trial following the Boston Massacre in 1770.
