1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ehidna [41]
1 year ago
5

Who oversees the fabrication and fit of all garments for theatrical productions, as well as film and television shows?

Social Studies
1 answer:
Alik [6]1 year ago
6 0

The person that  oversees the fabrication and fit of all garments for theatrical productions, as well as film and television shows is known to be Costume Designer.

<h3>What does a costume designer?</h3>

Costume designers is known to be a person who makes costumes for directors, producers, as well as writers.

Note that they often work with the production designer as well as the hair and makeup designer to aid the outlook and storytelling of any kind of production.

Therefore, The person that  oversees the fabrication and fit of all garments for theatrical productions, as well as film and television shows is known to be Costume Designer

Learn more about Costume Designer from

brainly.com/question/14411551

#SPJ1

You might be interested in
Please write an essay discussing whether and how a) the act of voting is the personal responsibility of every citizen, and b) ci
Delvig [45]

Voting: A Right, A Privilege, or A Responsibility?

When Americans talk about their democracy, they typically emphasize the importance of the right to vote. But the fact is that, unlike other democratic rights protected in the First Amendment, voting rights do not have clear constitutional protections. State legislatures have the right to appoint electors in presidential races without holding elections, for example, and states can enact a variety of policies that directly or indirectly infringe on suffrage rights. While strengthening voting rights in the Constitution would seem like a logical step, there's a potential political barrier: confusion about the meaning of "right."  

This essay invites readers to question whether the ability to vote should be a right, a privilege, or a responsibility. For the ease of readership, I will define the necessary terms:  

  • Privilege (n): An immunity or benefit enjoyed only by a person beyond the advantaged of most.
  • Right (n): That which is due to anyone by just claim, legal guarantees, or moral principles.
  • Responsibility (n): Being answerable or accountable for something within one's power, control, or management.

At first glance, it's easy to view these terms as mutually exclusive. From their definitions, we can see that what is a "privilege" cannot be a right since rights are enjoyed by everyone, while a privilege is reserved for a select group. Likewise, it's impossible for an individual to take on the burden of responsibility if they lack to the right to vote in the first place.

Despite this initial judgment, many people view the ability to vote as all three simultaneously and weigh "right" after "privilege" or "responsibility." For example, many believe the ability to vote is a privilege granted to today's eligible voters by those who fought for it in the past either through war, grassroots movements, or legislative battles. These struggles have kept the United States as an independent nation and granted us the right to vote with the passage of the 15th, 19th, 24th, and 26th amendment, in addition to the legislative victory of the Voting Rights Act of 1965. From this perspective, it is a privilege to live in the United States, standing on the shoulders of these past giants, and we have a responsibility to vote because it honors those who have put their lives on the line to protect it.

Indeed a study conducted in 2006 by Peter D. Hart Research Associates found far most participants in a series of focus groups saw voting as a responsibility or a privilege more than as a right. Many categorized voting primarily as a privilege because previous generations had fought for it and other countries don't enjoy the same freedom. The plurality of participants saw it primarily as a responsibility because it highlights the importance of choosing the government. Many of these participants chose not to classify it primarily as a "right" because the word "right" suggested to them a sense of entitlement.

Many participants also believed that fraud was a bigger problem than disenfranchisement. Although these beliefs are not based in reality (proven cases of voter fraud are miniscule compared to clear cases of denial of suffrage), they say something very important about the general mindset of American voters. When it comes to voting, "right" is a dangerous word since it suggests the ability to vote has simply been given to you without a fight -- and things that can make voting harder but prevent fraud like voter registration laws, requirements for photo identification and inconvenient polling places are minor compared to the sacrifices of past generations. In this mindset, anyone who might not vote due to such barriers is not accepting responsibility for how important it is and not recognizing what a privilege it is to have the right to vote.

As is obvious from the Peter Hart study, a common misconception is the word "right" denoting a sense of entitlement. People who hold this view shy away from considering the ability to vote a right because it suggests it has simply been given to us without historical struggles, thereby demeaning the individuals who have laid their lives on the line to forge and preserve our freedoms.

7 0
3 years ago
Read this passage from the Voting Rights Act.
daser333 [38]

Read this passage from the Voting Rights Act.

No voting qualification or prerequisite to voting . . . shall be imposed or applied by any State . . . to deny or abridge the right of any citizen of the United States to vote on account of race or color.

–Voting Rights Act,

1965

Based on the passage, the Voting Rights Act

made it illegal to create voting laws that discriminated.

gave states the power to impose their own voting rules.

established a set of qualifications required for voters.

made it legal to impose a poll tax on all potential voters.

Answer:

A. made it illegal to create voting laws that discriminated.

Explanation:

I took the test and got right

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Katie does not like wearing baggy pants because she thinks they do not look feminine. Katie's opinion is based on her perception
Sonbull [250]

 Katie does not like wearing baggy pants because she thinks they do not look feminine. Katie's opinion is based on her perception of gender

Gender is the range of characteristics that relate to and distinguish between feminine and masculine. Depending on the context, gender-related social structures and gender identities may be considered.

Gender refers to the socially constructed characteristics of women, men, girls, and boys. This includes the norms, behaviors, roles, and relationships associated with being a woman, man, girl, or boy. As a social structure, gender differs from society to society and can change over time.

Through conversations with real people, Benestad observed his seven unique genders. Female, male, intersex, trans, nonconforming, individual, eunuch

Learn more about gender here

brainly.com/question/9387794

#SPJ4

5 0
2 years ago
A better “divorce rate” measure that compares how many divorces occurred in a given year relative to the number of married peopl
vazorg [7]
Crude divorce rate is the ratio of the number of divorces to the average population in a given year. Divorce-marriage ratio is the ratio of the number of divorces to the number of marriages in a given year. Refined divorce rate is the ratio of divorces to the number of married women. Divorce rate is the general term for all of these ratios.

Thus, from the description, the answer is divorce-marriage ratio.
4 0
3 years ago
Based on the quote how does the supreme court interpret the second amendment
STALIN [3.7K]
The Second Amendment<span> of the United States Constitution reads: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." Such language has created considerable debate regarding the </span>Amendment's<span> intended scope.</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Anthropologist ralph linton said, "the last thing a fish would ever notice would be water." what does this imply about culture
    13·1 answer
  • Connie exhibits multiple personalities. Evidence that information learned by her secondary personality influences the moods and
    8·1 answer
  • Scientist who studies things that past culture have made and used
    8·2 answers
  • How did Georgia differ from the colonies in the north? Check all that apply.
    13·2 answers
  • Athletes, such as wrestlers, who desire to loss excess body fat but help maintain lean muscle mass, may be advised to increase t
    14·1 answer
  • Jeremy reads a chapter in a textbook knowing that he will be tested on the material. He is trying to get the information into hi
    7·1 answer
  • Pls hurryy!!! will mark brainliest!
    9·1 answer
  • The Consumer's role in the economy
    11·1 answer
  • 1.1 Define the following terms 1.1.1. Radiation 1.1.2. Degradation 1.13. Wavelength 1.1.4. Environmental hazards 1.1.5. Radioact
    8·1 answer
  • As the population of elderly in the united states increases, which service will likely see the biggest increase in demand?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!