Answer:
Integrity
Explanation:
Erik Erikson was a psychologist who developed a theory of social development according to which we go through different stages during our whole lifespan, these stages are basically crisis which we are supposed to solve in order to continue our development.
The last stage of this theory is called ego integrity versus despair and it begins at approximately age 65 and it continues until death. During this stage, people look back and contemplate their lives and the accomplishments they achieved in their lives. If they think they had a meaningful life they achieve a sense of integrity. On the other hand if they think their life wasn't meaningful, they develop a sense of despair.
In this example, Abner has 70 years old and he feels that his life has not been of any real value or significance. <u>Because of his age we can see that he must be in the stage of "ego integrity vs despair" and since he doesn't feel like he lived a meaningful live we can see that he is not achieving a sense of </u><u>integrity</u><u>. </u>
Is it dynasty? im not sure though
Answer:
Inadmissible, because prior bad acts cannot be admitted to prove the defendant's propensity to commit the specific crime with which he is charged
Explanation:
Evidence
This is refered to as a group or a collective mass of things such as testimony and exhibits etc.
Trier of law helps to know what laws apply to the case, decides on what evidence is admissible, reviews written briefs submitted by both sides, gives legal points and authories relevant to the decision etc.
The role of prosecutor
They are responsible for filing of charges, trials, and appeals, review the actions of police officers, make judgements on whether they were appropriate etc.
The role of defense is responsible for trial strategy.
The evidence is admissible in court are only important evidence related to its admissible in court. In some few cases, relevant evidence will not be admitted in court.
A relevant evidence is inadmissible if it one is when the evidence found is in violation of the defendants constitutional rights or violations of the hearsay rule that state that information is opportuned.etc.
Answer:
Justice O'Connor was on issues of race, religion, and abortion, and gay marriage
Explanation:
