There are good arguments on both sides as to when and how fast to reopen the economy. In my view, the answer will vary state by state and industry by industry. There’s also an enormous amount of uncertainty as to exactly how to determine the optimal policy. In that environment, there’s a great advantage to having these decisions be made at as local a level as possible. Thus, while I suspect that Sweden’s current policy is not optimal, that Nordic country is doing a great service to Europe by providing evidence on the consequences of an alternative policy path.
Giving too much power to any one person is dangerous, especially when that person might be influenced by political considerations that go beyond the best interest of the country as a whole:
That’s not to say Trump’s views are necessary wrong; rather that the procedure he uses to reach decisions is not reliable. Thus I’d still favor local control even if in one particular case you could convince me that the views of the person who happened to be president at the time were superior to the views of the average mayor or governor. In the long run, competition between states will produce better governance than central planning.
Substance abuse would be the answer. Hope this helps.
Appeals are decided by panels of three judges. The court of appeals does not receive additional evidence or hear witnesses; rather the judges make their decision based on the written record of the case in the trial court, the briefs submitted by the parties, and possibly oral argument.
Answer:
(A) stereotype threat
Explanation:
Stereotype Threat or Stereotype Vulnerability is a situation where people are or feel at risk of conforming to the stereotypes of their social group. Since its introduction in the academic literature, the threat of stereotype has become one of the most studied subjects in the field of social psychology.
Answer:Positive Punishment
Explanation:
Positive is when a stimulus is added with a purpose to decrease a behavior.
Punishment is a term used in Operant conditioning which discourages an unwanted behavior from reoccurring.
When a person is exposed to unwanted negative consequences they are likely to quite the behavior.
A punishment is positive when it adds unwanted consequences.
A meeting with the dean was added, and this decreased the behavior (unprofessional behavior), so this is positive punishment.
