1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Galina-37 [17]
1 year ago
13

What was Uruk's most important legacy?

History
1 answer:
insens350 [35]1 year ago
7 0

The most important legacy of Uruk was the ability to use writing to preserve memory and imagination.

<h3>What was significant about Uruk?</h3><h3 />

Uruk was one of the very first cities that was founded on Earth. It was in Mesopotamia and had thousands of people living in it at its height. Uruk was a very influential center for trade, politics, and the arts during its time and this was primarily down to their ability to write their activities down.

Using clay tables, the people of Uruk were able to keep a record of the art and activities they went through. This meant that they were able to preserve the memory and imagination of the city. This is said to be Uruk's greatest legacy.

Find out more on the city of Uruk at brainly.com/question/593076

#SPJ1

You might be interested in
Which government institution may vote on constitutional amendments?
Paha777 [63]

which government institution may vote on constitutional amendments?

A. executive  

B. judicial  

C. bureaucracy  

<u>D. legislative</u>

7 0
3 years ago
Who is credited with establishing Catholicism in western Europe? Clovis Theodoric Attila Vortigern
bearhunter [10]

Answer:

Clovis

Explanation:

After the fall of the Roman Empire, the Catholicism was not int he greatest of positions and it was facing serious challenges to survive. The first person, king, that helped in the survival and spreading out of the Catholicism was Clovis. Clovis was the first Germanic King that accepted the Christian faith, and once he did he was very firm of establishing it everywhere he could and protect it. Clovis managed to convert lot of people in Western Europe, some willfully, some forcefully, but anyways he managed to set the ground for the further spreading out of the Catholicism.

3 0
3 years ago
I need help I really don’t know
Maurinko [17]

Yes I think that each side has good things to say about the other side. This is because I think that many people's political viewpoints don't always perfectly align to one party or the other. In reality, life is much more complicated than picking one side. Sure some people might agree with policies from the Democrat's side, but they might see other Republican views to be valid as well. I like to think of it as a buffet of ideas, where people tend to pick and choose which talking points they magnetically snap to. We could have for example a socially liberal person but who supports conservative financial measures; or we could have someone who has very religious conservative morals, but supports liberal monetary policies.

In other words, it's unrealistic to assume people will be purely one party. Those who seem that way tend to be stuck in a bubble where it's like a feedback loop of talking points fed to them. Fox News is one example of this on the conservative side, while MSNBC is an example of this on the liberal side. Those stuck in this bubble would likely not have much nice things to say about the other side, if they have anything nice to say at all. However, I think to some (if not many) people, politics has become very toxic that they simply turn the tv off entirely. By "turn off", I mean literally turn it off or change the channel to something else. These people I'd consider somewhere in the middle in a moderate range. Furthermore, these moderates are likely to have some nice things to say about both sides, but they might have their complaints about both sides as well.

In short, if you pick someone from either extreme, then it's likely they'll have nothing nice to say about the other side. If you pick someone from the middle, then they might have nice things to say about both sides. It all depends who you ask. Also, it depends on how politically active they are.

7 0
3 years ago
The extent of the Byzantine territory at the height of the empire, located?
Alisiya [41]
The extent of the Byzantine territory was the highest during Justinian I rule. He almost reclaimed all territories that once belonged to the Roman Empire.
5 0
3 years ago
A person studying macroeconomics would be most interested in:
Lostsunrise [7]

Answer: I believe the answer is C.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Why didn’t Darwin like the Galapagos Islands?
    10·2 answers
  • What is the impact of the African slave trade on North America?
    5·1 answer
  • When did the dravidians arrive?
    9·1 answer
  • Can someone give the answer
    12·1 answer
  • What role did religious fundamentalism play in the 1998 American embassy bombings?
    6·2 answers
  • 29)
    15·2 answers
  • How is the work of the Reconstruction-era Freedmen's Bureau reflected in the state of Georgia today? * in the state's public sch
    12·1 answer
  • Question is above photo :) also if you can’t see the photo tell me thank you :)
    13·1 answer
  • How do Telemachus’s actions in battle compare to his father’s?
    6·1 answer
  • How was the rise of communism in the Soviet Union like the rise of communism in China?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!