Answer:
These Juries were capable of coming to two such verdict because, a criminal jury's burden of proof is "beyond a reasonable doubt" and a civil jury's burden of proof is "preponderance of the evidence."
A criminal's jury burden of proof being beyond a reasonable doubt means that the legal standard for deciding the outcome of a criminal charge, requires evidence that is sufficient to eliminate any doubts that a reasonable person might entertain about whether a claim is more likely to be true than not.
A civil jury burden of proof being preponderance of the evidence means that the legal standard applied for deciding the outcome of civil disputes, requires that evidence be sufficient to determine that a claim is more likely to be true than not.
I believe the answer is: the DSM-5.
the DSM-5 filled with standard classifications that professionals in psychological field can used to identify the type of illness that their patients have. With this classifications, we hoped that there would be less cases when different psychologists offered different conclusions and make the patients confused.
the answer is all of the above :) hope this helps!!
These are a couple things you could choose!
Answer:
<em>Lack of feedback</em>
Explanation:
<em>Lack of feedback: </em>The term lack of feedback is defined as a process in which a speaker fails to modify or alter a particular message which is intended to help the listener in a better way to understand the speaker's position and attitude. If any business fails to develop an open feedback process then they are being operated in a communication vacuum.
<em>Feedback is considered as necessary as it provides a positive criticism and allows to change things wherever required.</em>
