Answer:
The missing options are:
A. Potential confounding variables are not always controlled din laboratory studies
.
B. Retention tests employed in laboratory studies are usually once merged with factual information rather than emotions
.
C. The intensity of emotional responses is more accurately measured after the event in laboratory studies
.
D. Memories and emotional experiences as in real life are very different from those generated in laboratory studies.
The correct answer is option D.
Explanation:
Generalizability measures how useful is what scientists have been studying in a laboratory in comparison with the real-life since the first option is a prototype of reality that can miss valuable variables that can have an impact on the real life. With generalizability, we can see if the results of the investigation and the process that scientists used are useful in real life and can apply to other things or communities. The efficiency of generalizability depends on how well the representation of reality was in the laboratory.
D. The fear of the spread of Communism
<span>D. Mount Saint Helens
</span><span>C. pyroclastic flows.
</span>
NOT:
A. Kilauea
B. Parícutin
<span>C. Himalayas
</span>
NOT:
<span>A. melting rocks.
B. rising magma.
D. pyroclastic deposits.</span><span>
</span>
Answer:
Psychological arousal is very simimal for several emotions, so it is not always reliable for the polygraph to distinguish one emotion reaction from another. For instance guilt from other reactions.
Explanation:
The polygraph can most certainly determine if a person is nervous or not, because the nervous system reacts under testing situations, as well as other body reactions. This is not sufficient enought to deternmine wether someone is lying or not, is guilty or not. Someone can be nervous, and the polygraph can identify it, but this does not neccesarily mean a person can be found guilty.
Answer:
True.
Explanation:
The given statement would be considered true as it asserts a true claim about J.S. Mill's 'principle of liberty' denying the conception of 'victimless crime'. He stated that individual actions should only be restricted when it is causing damage to others. He proclaimed that "the only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others". In simple terms, he stated that no one should be prevented from doing a specific action unless his/her actions are not invasive or harmful to the other's rights. Therefore, the given assertion is <u>true.</u>
