Answer:
pretty sure its land disputes
Answer:
d
Explanation:
because there is no endless item or resource and will always be renewable
True. President Obama and his admiration actively worked towards implementing a strategy of protectionism.
What is protectionism?
The economic policy of limiting imports from other countries through means such as tariffs on imported goods, import quotas, and a range of other governmental regulations is known as protectionist, also known as trade protectionism. Supporters contend that protectionist measures benefit domestic producers, companies, and workers in the industry that competes with imports from international rivals. Opponents contend that protectionist measures hinder trade and have a negative impact on both the producers and employees in export-related industries in the country enacting the policies as well as in the nations shielded from them (by increasing the cost of imported goods).
To know more about protectionism check out:
brainly.com/question/1616157
#SPJ4
The appropriate response is heart rates. A typical resting heart rate for grown-ups ranges from 60 to 100 pulsates a moment. By and large, a lower heart rate very still infers more productive heart capacity and better cardiovascular wellness. For instance, an all around prepared competitor may have an ordinary resting heart rate more like 40 thumps a moment.
One particular organization that fought for racial equality was the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) founded in 1909. For about the first 20 years of its existence, it tried to persuade Congress and other legislative bodies to enact laws that would protect African Americans from lynchings and other racist actions. Beginning in the 1930s, though, the NAACP's Legal Defense and Education Fund began to turn to the courts to try to make progress in overcoming legally sanctioned discrimination. From 1935 to 1938, the legal arm of the NAACP was headed by Charles Hamilton Houston. Houston, together with Thurgood Marshall, devised a strategy to attack Jim Crow laws by striking at them where they were perhaps weakest—in the field of education. Although Marshall played a crucial role in all of the cases listed below, Houston was the head of the NAACP Legal Defense and Education Fund while Murray v. Maryland and Missouri ex rel Gaines v. Canada were decided. After Houston returned to private practice in 1938, Marshall became head of the Fund and used it to argue the cases of Sweat v. Painter and McLaurin v. Oklahoma Board of Regents of Higher Education.
