Answer:
Project Alpha 81
Project Beta 81
Project Gamma 83
Project Delta 81
Among the four projects the most likely candidates to be implemented will
be Project Gamma .
Explanation:
Screening Model
1.Calculation for Project Alpha
Important Weight×Weight Score = Weighted Score
Quality 5 × 1 =5
Cost 3 ×7 =21
Speed 7 ×5 =35
Visibility 5 ×3= 15
Reliability 1× 5 =5
Total Score =81
2.Important Weight ×Weight Score = Weighted Score
Calculation for Project Beta
Quality 5 × 3 =15
Cost 3 ×7 =21
Speed 7× 5 =35
Visibility 5×1 =5
Reliability 1 ×5 =5
Total Score =81
3.Important Weight ×Weight Score = Weighted Score
Calculation for Project Gamma
Quality 5 ×3 =15
Cost 3 ×5 =15
Speed 7× 3= 21
Visibility 5×5 =25
Reliability 1×7 =7
Total Score=83
4.Important Weight ×Weight Score = Weighted Score
Calculation for project Delta
Quality 5 ×5 =25
Cost 3 ×3 =9
Speed 7× 5 =35
Visibility 5×1 =5
Reliability 1 ×7 =7
Total Score =81
Therefore among the four projects the most likely candidates to be implemented will
be Project Gamma because it has the highest
score with a score of 83.
1) demand deposit account.
2) Computer software.
3) Saved for emergencies.
4) A job.
5) It's far more difficult to manage an account electronically.
6) Checks written after the statement closing date wouldn't appear on the statement.
7) When a check is drawn for more than the balance, the rest comes from a credit card account.
8) The account holder does not need to record the amount of the purchase in his or her check register.
9) All the above.
10) Easier.
Answer:
the ending inventory using the LIFO method is $1,225
Explanation:
The computation of the value of the inventory using the LIFO method is shown below;
Since there are 196 closing units
So,
= 146 units × $6 + 49 units × $7
= $882 + $343
= $1,225
The $6 come from
= $882 ÷ 147 units
And, $7 comes from
= $1,372 ÷ 196 units
Hence, the ending inventory using the LIFO method is $1,225
Answer:
Georgeland has an absolute but not a comparative advantage in producing clothing.
Explanation:
Absolute advantage is defined as the ability of a firm to produce higher amounts of a product as a result of use of the same resources with other competitors. It is usually bad a result of more efficient production process.
Comparative advantage is the ability of a firm to produce goods at a lower opportunity cost. Therefore they are able to sell at lower price compared to competitors.
Georgeland can produce 18 units of clothe per year while Alland can produce 16 units per year, so Georgeland has absolute advantage.
In producing clothes Georgeland has opportunity cost of 36 units of food which is higher than that of Alland which is 32 units of food. So Georgeland does not have comparative advantage in producing clothes.
