Answer:
The number of equivalent units using the weighted-average method is 185,000.
Explanation:
Determine the number of units completed and transferred out.
Number of units completed and transferred out = Units in beginning
+ Units started and completed during the month
=35,000+110,000
=145,000
Therefore, the number of units completed and transferred out is 145,000 units.
It is given that the beginning units completed is 35,000, and the units started and completed are 110,000. They are added to calculate the number of units completed and transferred out. Therefore, the number of units completed and transferred out is 145,000 units.
----
Determine the number of equivalent units using the weighted-average method.
Equivalent units = Number of units completed and transferred out + Additional units in process ×Percentagecompleted
=145,000+(40,000×100%)
=185,000
Answer:
Paul's learning style is that of a <u>Assimilator(a)</u>
Explanation:
- The Assimilating learning style lays emphasis on concept and logic.
- The people with Assimilative learning style prefer to gather wide range of information and then they organize it in clear ,logical format.
- These people are attracted towards logical theories like analytical models.
Answer:
<h3>
<em><u>i</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>d</u></em><em><u>o</u></em><em><u>n</u></em><em><u>'</u></em><em><u>t</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>k</u></em><em><u>n</u></em><em><u>o</u></em><em><u>w</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>i</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>h</u></em><em><u>a</u></em><em><u>v</u></em><em><u>e</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>n</u></em><em><u>o</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>a</u></em><em><u>n</u></em><em><u>s</u></em><em><u>w</u></em><em><u>e</u></em><em><u>r</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>t</u></em><em><u>o</u></em></h3>
Explanation:
<em>s</em><em>o</em><em>r</em><em>r</em><em>y</em><em> </em><em>a</em><em>g</em><em>a</em><em>i</em><em>n</em><em> </em><em>i</em><em> </em><em>n</em><em>e</em><em>e</em><em>d</em><em> </em><em>a</em><em>n</em><em>s</em><em>w</em><em>e</em><em>r</em><em> </em><em>t</em><em>o</em><em>o</em><em>,</em><em>a</em><em>n</em><em>y</em><em>o</em><em>n</em><em>e</em>
Answer:the change is 8.97. I’m not sure what the second one is wanting?
Option D is true, the price of the good sold will rise under either policy and there will be a reduction in the level of production
Explanation:
Carbon-free is an effective way, even though the economy puts a monetary price above it and gives a value to the actual cost. Since the pollutant price is still in place, polluters are motivated to reduce pollution and to decide how far the gasses are produced.
In comparison, the restriction or cap on pollution can be published from industry by the cap-and-trade system. This limit is decreased in many cases after the pollution goal is met. If this is the case, the law requires polluters to buy the remaining quota from others with low emissions and generate more than the allotted quota.
Both methodologies will increase the cost of the good generated because it is distortionary. Production should however be decreased because of the control of pollution.
