Answer:
Parole officers are responsible for monitoring the activities of parolees; offenders recently released from prison. Traditionally, only those offenders who acknowledged responsibility for their past criminal behavior and demonstrated an ability to reenter society without re-offending earned the privilege of parole. More recently, however, several state and federal courts have ruled that prison overcrowding constitutes cruel and unusual punishment. In an effort to reduce their populations, several states have begun releasing offenders on parole, often years before their sentence is completed. This practice has not been well received by members of various parole boards who believe the practice of paroling offenders to reduce overcrowding robs the board of the opportunity to evaluate whether an offender is likely to comply with the conditions of his or her parole and avoid re-offending.
Explanation:
I can’t write an essay for you, but i
would recommend asking your self what didn’t you like about the remote learning. Then put them together into a paragraph using a lot of good words. Do that with every topic after. Use good grammar!
The reasons there are more private security than police are:
- It is expensive to fund more police.
- Need to fill in gap left by police.
- Getting into police is relatively difficult.
<h3>Why are there more private security than Police?</h3>
- As the police are funded by taxes, it would be a huge drain on the economy if more police officers were hired.
- There are many businesses and people in need of protection and because the police cannot be there all the time, private security is turned to.
- Police training and accreditation in a lot of cities in also quite cumbersome and intensive. A lot of people who apply don't make it.
In conclusion, there are several reasons for the disparity between police numbers and that of private security.
Find out more about private security at brainly.com/question/7203143.
Answer:
If I were an off-duty police officer and found a wallet with money, credit cards and personal documentation from a third party, without a doubt I would proceed to return said wallet with all its contents to its rightful owner. Thus, I would use my position as a law enforcement officer to track down said person and, once located, I would return their belongings.
I would do this for two reasons: first, because I consider that it is ethically and morally correct, since I do not own any of the belongings of the person who lost the wallet; and on the other hand, as a police officer I know the law and I know that appropriating something that does not belong to me can become a violation of the law.
