The Pearl Harbor Bombing was a factor.
Out of the three movements, the independence of India was the one that required the least amount of fighting. India achieved its independence in a peaceful manner through the adoption of the ideas of civil disobedience. However, although the process of independence was initially peaceful and led to a straight-forward retreat of the British, its aftermath was more complicated. In the aftermath of independence, India was fragmented into India and Pakistan, with Bangladesh separating from Pakistan later on.
In the case of Latin America, there were several movements that took place at different times. However, several of this were unified thanks to the figure of Simon Bolivar. The conflicts that took place were a lot more violent than those of India. Moreover, fragmentation was also more significant, as these resulted in the creation of several new countries.
Finally, the independence of the United States took place much earlier than these other independence movements. The independence of the Thirteen Colonies was one of the earliest movements for independence to take place. However, it did not lead to the creation of a country. Instead, it led to the creation of a union or a confederacy of several separate colonies, united through some common ties and documents, such as the Declaration of Independence and the Articles of Confederation.
<span>Good Morning!
For the Puritans some aspects of Christianity are fundamental. Among them we can point to the idea of Grace, that is, "undeserved favor". For them, both material goods and salvation are strictly derived from divine grace. A second fundamental point is the notion that the Bible (and not the Church) is God's sole source of authority in religious faith and practice. Finally, a third point that can be quoted is the idea of "covenant." The "covenant" is an alliance established by God with individuals.
Hugs!</span>
Answer:
The Constitution explicitly assigns the president the power to sign or veto. I hope this help : )
Explanation:
The comparison between the historical fiction and historical non-fiction can be described as follows:
- Meaning
- Characters
- Occurrence
<h3>What is meant by history?</h3>
History describes those events which had already occurred in the past times of ancient eras.
Historical fiction and historical non-fiction can be differentiated as follows:
- The historical fiction writes in the historical era whereas historical nonfiction is the one that may or may not be based on historical events that occurred in ancient times.
- The characters in historical fiction are being created on an imaginary basis but the nonfictional characters already existed in historical eras.
- The occurrence of historical fiction relates to past times but the no fiction historical need not necessarily belong to ancient times.
Therefore, the difference between Historical fiction and non-fiction has been explained above.
Learn more about the fiction story in the related link:
brainly.com/question/19202814
#SPJ1