Answer:
The correct answer here is option b.
Explanation:
When here is an increase in capital, the firm would like to produce more. So, the demand for labor would increase. Though the supply of labor would remain the same as it is not affected by the change in capital.
With the shift in the demand curve, the quantity of labor hired would increase as well. With no change in labor supply, the wage rate will increase as well.
If a firm's marginal costs <u>fall</u>, then its <u>price falls.</u>
This is based on the principle that if the marginal cost of a product or firm rises, that implies that the firm is operating at a high fixed cost, thereby leading to an increase in the cost of production, which generally equates to products having a high price.
On the other hand, where there is low marginal cost, production costs reduce because the products are being produced at a lower fixed cost. Thereby leading to lower prices.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that "If a firm's marginal costs <u>fall</u>, then its <u>price falls</u>."
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/10474336
I believe the answer is: inductive reasoning
In inductive reasoning, the premises would be viewed as some sort of supply of evidence for the general conclusion. In the example above,
"all professional athletes earn a lot of money" is the premise that is used as some sort of evidence for " wes makes a lot of money", which is the speaker's conclusion.
Answer:
B) $4.67
Explanation:
By definition marginal revenue is the revenue generated by the sale of one more unit of product Z.
Marginal revenue = unit price
Since firm X participates in a perfectly competitive market, it is a price taker, and since the marginal revenue is constant, we can assume that this is the equilibrium price of product Z.
