1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
aev [14]
1 year ago
9

How does Swift use satire in this passage to criticize society he suggests?

English
1 answer:
Llana [10]1 year ago
6 0

Swift uses satire in the passage to criticize society he suggests. He makes the implication that the English don't care about the people from Ireland and would be okay with using kids from Ireland as food.

Who is Jonathan Swift?

Jonathan Swift, who was born in London on 30 November 1667 and died in Dublin on 19 October 1745, was a satirist, author, essayist, political pamphleteer (first for the Whigs, then for the Tories), poet, and Anglican cleric. He also served as dean of St. Patrick's Cathedral, earning him the moniker "Dean Swift."

A Tale of a Tub (1704), An Argument Against the Elimination of Christianity (1712), Gulliver's Travels (1726), and A Modest Proposal are among the works by Swift that are most renowned (1729). He is acknowledged as the English language's best prose humorist by the Encyclopedia Britannica, while his poetry is less widely known. Horatian and Juvenalian satire were two forms of humour he was a master at.

His satire has come to be known as "Swiftian" due to his deadpan, sardonic writing style, especially in A Modest Proposal.

To learn more about Jonathan Swift from the given link

brainly.com/question/9066127

#SPJ4

How does Swift use satire in this passage to criticize society he suggests?

You might be interested in
Which title of a movie is printed correctly? A. Toy Story B. "Toy Story" C. Toy Story
vodomira [7]
I'm not 100% sure if it's "B".
3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Journal: Write a persuasive paragraph. Include a topic sentence (don't write because or give a
guapka [62]

I'm going to give you some starters which you can use for your paragraph <3

Have you ever wondered what would happen if there wasn’t any zoos to go to anymore? Just imagining if your favourite animal wasn’t there anymore and soon the population control was dwindling simply or out of control even simply because we don’t have the resources to help these animals anymore. Zoos have been around for over a thousand of years and if it wasn’t for some of these zoos, some of these animals would be considered extinct. Zoos have a rich history that with conversation efforts and educating the public for future generations to come is important to know and learn what each one of us can do to help.

It’s extremely beneficial to us since we wouldn’t be able to see these animals otherwise and help the endangered species grow and be around for future generations. The zoos have specific breeding programs that help grow the species and they also do a rescue and release on the animal if it’s sick or hurt. Zoos have a lot of beneficial reasons to be around. It’s considered a safe haven for these animals that can’t survive in the wild otherwise. Hunters and poachers are dwindling resources that should be thriving, but they continue to hunt protected species and the ones they don’t kill all the way is found and either humanely euthanized or is taken to one of the wildlife resources so that they have a chance of survival especially if their young is found nearby and wouldn’t survive without its mother.

However, there are also many groups of people believe that zoos are against animal rights and inhuman. For example, a lot of animals rights advocates hold this perspective because based on researches that they did, they discovered that there is a lot difference between wild animals and zoo animals. Elephants is a great example. Wild elephants have a longer life spans than captive elephants. Wild elephants can usually live 60-70 years. However, the captive elephants usually die before the age of 40. (User, S.) The difference on the life spans between this two groups clearly shows that zoos are not doing anything good for these elephants. These elephants are able to live longer in wild instead of living in a zoo and to be watched by all kinds.

It is true that zoos are necessary in some ways, and in today’s world, zoos might be a good way to protect animals from all kinds of danger. However, in the future, animals should not be kept in zoos. Animals have their rights to live happier in their nature habitats. Based on the basic relationship between animals and humans, animals have the equal rights and freedom just like humans. We are all kinds of forms of lives on the earth. As human, we can’t put our own will on animals and do something that we believe will be good for other creatures.

6 0
3 years ago
Have you read the book to kill a mockingbird?
nekit [7.7K]
"You know what we want," another man said. "Get aside from the door, Mr. Finch."
    "You can turn around and go home again, Walter," Atticus said pleasantly. "Heck Tate's around somewhere."
    "The hell he is," said another man.
    "... Called 'em off on a snipe hunt... Didn't you think about that, Mr. Finch."
<span>    "Thought about it, but didn't believe it. Well then," my father's voice was still the same, "that changes things, doesn't it?"</span>
8 0
2 years ago
what are likely repercussions to your organisation if you were to sell contaminated food or beverages to your customer ?
Juli2301 [7.4K]

The repercussion of the happening might be enough to destroy a business if people spread the news about a place that sells contaminated food.

In addition to that, the organization might be sued. It can also lose its license for food safety violations.

If an employee is to blame, specifically, he or she can be fired and most likely will be.

Also, a business will most likely pay a fine for the violating the safety regulations and it is possible that the business will receive a court order to change its food safety practices and policies if not removed from business.

7 0
3 years ago
What is the difference between low-self and high-self? How can you keep yourself engaged?
Andrews [41]

Answer:

the difference is at low self your at your lowest point and high self is when ur at ur highest point

Explanation:

at your lowest you don't feel your best at your highest point is when ur feeling better

4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What does the word nominal mean in this sentence? …our subjection to the king of Benin was little more than nominal; for every t
    15·2 answers
  • For which reason would writers most likely choose to write satire?
    6·2 answers
  • What is your interpretation of the dogs' behavior?
    14·1 answer
  • In what two ways can a setting influence a story?
    12·1 answer
  • Write an article on ‘Importance of Morning Walk.’​
    9·1 answer
  • Which word s can u find in Ulotrichous?
    6·2 answers
  • Match the purpose of each statement from the text to the text statement itself. This habit is hurting relationships
    8·1 answer
  • Based on what you learned in lesson 3, what is the plural form of medium?
    7·2 answers
  • Which sentence below uses an
    13·2 answers
  • Which of the following most likely explains why Ulysses didn't return to Ithaca immediately following the Trojan War?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!