The evidence that the author used to support faulty analogy in the text is <u>some people talk to their plants to help them grow</u>
According to the excerpt, the narrator talks about plants and hamsters and their similarities and differences. He deceptively compares them by saying that a hamster requires attention from its owner, usually by talking, but plants cando fine without needing anybody to talk to them.
Faulty analogy is a type of fallacy that makes use of deceptive comparisons to attempt to prove a point.
Therefore, the evidence that the author used to support faulty analogy in the text is <u>some people talk to their plants to help them grow</u>
Read more here:
brainly.com/question/4025909
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
Nice one
Explanation:
you have your country at mind
 
        
             
        
        
        
The focus change is in the point of view; first, she thought that she did her first sale and was ready to do it, as nobody opened, she thought there was nobody at home. Then, she changed her point of view because she thought to return and that she wasn't a good salesperson, however, she knocked on the door again with a smile on her face.
 
        
                    
             
        
        
        
The question is very personal.For some people there are certain measures that make a book godd and for others the measures are completely different.For me the two measures at odds are whether the story is narrated in a way the reader gets so involved that the book is unputdownable and the other is the characters.If I get trapped by a story in which the development and unpredictability of the characters make me continue reading , the book is good for me.