Answer should be B
(extra lines)
The correct answer is During a time of war.
The Schenck vs. United States Supreme Court case deals with the issue of freedom of speech during the World War I era. In this case, Schenck was using his freedom of speech to convince people to avoid the military draft that was taking place in the United States. The Supreme Court ruled that this is not protected free speech, as this speech presented a clear and present danger to American society, especially since this was done during World War I.
<span>It depends on the President. Sometimes, such as the case of Jefferson and Jackson, the party was organized with the president running it. Sometimes, such as in the case of Grant and Eisenhower, the party needed a candidate and offered the nomination to a likely winner. Such presidents do little for party organization, except inspire it .</span>
The net effect of the opinions delivered by the Marshall Court was that the Supreme Court became much more powerful--on par with the legislative and executive branches, which proves that Marshall believed that government should be limited with checks and balances.
