1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
prisoha [69]
3 years ago
5

"Prithvi Narayan Shah was an expert and far sighted politician and successful administrator." Explain.​

History
1 answer:
Serjik [45]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

PNS personally commanded many battles. The battles taught him how to handle complex situations and how he could come out victorious.

PNS focused on his goal and used all means (Saam, Daam, Danda, Bhed) for his campaign. As he fought battles, he understood why integrating the nearby kingdoms could be beneficial against the rising British hegemony in the region. He also realized that the diversity of Nepal could be exploited by British to divide the kingdom.

Explanation:

Prithvi Narayan Shah was not a strategist in the beginning. As soon as he became the king of Gorkha, he wanted to capture Nuwakot. In 1800 B.S., the first troop he sent under Biraj Thapa could not cross the Trishuli River. PNS, however, was not satisfied with the delay and sent another troop under Maheshwar Panta. The Gorkhali troop lost to the nature (Trishuli) as well the soldiers of Nuwakot.

After the loss, PNS became a military strategist. He went Benaras, brought some weapons and trained his soldiers so that they obey all commands without fear. He also developed the Marwat system for helping the soldier’s family if he died in a battle. He also used Yogis, the devotees of Gorakhnath, as spies.

He did not know how to use geography to strategical advantage before he himself led the Second Battle of Nuwakot in 1801 B.S. Had Kalu Pandey not found a way to divert huge number of Nuwakote soldiers, PNS could have died in the battle.

He had already understood politics, though. Before the Second Battle of Nuwakot, PNS had realized that the Chaubise Rajyas could be threat to his campaign and he might have to kill his kins in Kaski, Lamjung and Tanahun. To avoid the “sins”, he changed his gotra from Bhardwaj to Kasyap.

He also understood that Nepal (the then Kathmandu Valley—Kantipur, Patan, and Bhaktapur) would be against him as soon as he captured Nuwakot. So he kept a cordial relation with Ranjit Malla of Bhaktapur, who was also his Meet Baa (best friend’s father/father’s best friend)

PNS used the anarchy established by the Pradhans to make his brother Dal Mardan Shah the king of Patan from 1820–1822. When PNS attacked Kirtipur in 1822, Dal Mardan Shah did not oppose even though the Pradhans had urged him to do so. On Poush 3, 1822, PNS won the third battle of Kirtipur. Less than four years later, PNS was the king of Nepal.

PNS also understood how the people of Nepal Mandal lived. When he won the surrounding areas, he imposed a complete economic blockade which was one of the biggest reasons behind his victory over Kantipur, Patan and Bhaktapur.

Through treaties and diplomatic understandings, he was able to solve a lot of problems with the Chaubises and Baises, the British, the Tibetan and the Newas.

You might be interested in
How is Spain’s government different <br> from Portugal’s government?
tresset_1 [31]

Answer:

Explanation:

The biggest geographic difference between Portugal and Spain is the size; Spain is around five times larger than Portugal. Both countries have Mediterranean climates, meaning they are generally temperate, with warm summers and mild winters...

6 0
3 years ago
An account designed for payment of regular bills is
grandymaker [24]

Answer:

checking

Explanation:

Checking accounts are designed for regular spending and immediate needs such as paying bills

8 0
3 years ago
Who was not a key U.S. commander in World War II?
Illusion [34]
If Robert McNamara is one of the options, then he is the correct answer - he was important in the Vietnam War, but not during the WWII.
3 0
3 years ago
When the abbasid caliphs tried to secure their position by creating an army of turkish warriors, what was the ultimate result?
Elena L [17]
The creation of the an army of Turkish warriors to help the Abbasid Caliphs secure their position ultimately led to the conversion of the Turks to Islam, and eventually giving them control over Sunni Islam.

The Abbasid Caliphs were leaders of the "Abbasid Dynasty," which is 2nd of the two great Sunni (Islam) dynasties. Meanwhile, the Seljuk Turks were nomadic people who converted to Islam. Because they were often used as military mercenaries by the Abbasid Caliphate, their power grew, eventually weakening the power of the caliphs, and giving them "control over" Sunni Islam. They revitalized Islamic laws, reorganized the institutions, and provided political stability to the empire. 
6 0
3 years ago
How can negative stereotypes about racial groups affect their prosperity
Fantom [35]
Do you have any answer choices
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The gods of the Aztec religion each had a specialty and purpose. <br> True or False
    6·1 answer
  • What three nations battled for control of the Americans in the 1600s ?
    13·2 answers
  • What can you reflects thomas gibbons’s view of interstate commerce?
    12·1 answer
  • Why were immigrants turned into suspects in WW1?
    13·2 answers
  • What type of government does the united states have in ww2?
    14·1 answer
  • is this statement true or false James madison believed that the delegates at the constitutional convention could keep the revise
    9·1 answer
  • Which choices are examples of religious A Hinduism B Judism C Buddism D christanity E islam
    15·2 answers
  • Please help ill give brainly and heart !!!!
    7·1 answer
  • RESEARCH TOPIC
    12·1 answer
  • In the 1920s, who is able to attend collage?
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!