I think both, my reasons are, first, we have more technology and better transportation that will help us, like the technology to take and give to others, and the cars and trains ect. to help us to get from one place to another a bit quicker. Also i think worse because of the green house causes, the cars,oil,and other things we use in our everyday life is slowly ruining the planet, ecosystem ect. there are downsides and upsides to both.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Because in Friedman's view making profit is the only social responsibility of the company. He said this because in his view the company has to earn profit for investments and if the company makes investments, it would create jobs and increased exports. So this means this is the best social responsibility in context of a economist, the company can pursue.
Here is the answer. Suppose that consumption depends on the interest rate, how this alters the conclusions is that at any given level of the interest rate, national saving falls by the change in government purchases. You should also consider <span>what happens when government purchases increase. Hope this helps.</span>
Answer:
0.17
Explanation:
The computation of the expected return on investment is shown below:
= (Expected return of the outcome 1 × Probability of the outcome 1) + (Expected return of the outcome 1 × Probability of the outcome 1) + (Expected return of the outcome 1 × Probability of the outcome 1)
= (0.15× 0.50) + (0.25 × 0.30) + (0.10 × 0.20)
= 0.075 + 0.075 + 0.02
= 0.17
Answer:
<em>The</em><em> </em><em>difference</em><em> </em><em>between</em><em> </em><em>what</em><em> </em><em>it</em><em> </em><em> costs to make and</em><em>sell a product and what a customer pays for is referred to as</em>
