The amount of money I would have in US dollars would be $1,000
<h3>How much would I have in US dollars?</h3>
The first step is to convert dollars to pesos:
$1000 x 10 = 10,000 pesos
The second step is to determine the value of the investment in a year's time: (1.10) x 10,000 = 11,000 pesos
Now, convert pesos to dollars : 11,000 / 11 = $1,000
To learn more about exchange rate, please check : brainly.com/question/25780725
#SPJ1
Answer:
Hi
It meant a political situation among the states in which none of them achieved a power superior to the others. It is an idea of the late Middle Ages, applied to major or minor geographic regions that comprise the plurality of sovereign territories. Throughout Europe there is a legitimate feeling, always subject to interpretation, whereby any action required the confirmation of the rest of the States, the most significant case being the invasion of a territory. In this way the doctrine of just war was reached, to the problem of to what extent and to what extent the actual or imminent engraving of a State could mean a warlike justification. Transactions between contestants, neutral or rival, never ended, hence the relevance of diplomacy, as the concepts of balance, neutrality, freedom of Europe or sovereignty are interpreted continuously, while being used in conversations. Some thought of equilibrium as a natural system, because it was a consequence of international relations, and when a great power had too much force it threatened the others, and therefore, had to counteract the disproportion. Others considered it a desired goal for which he had fought.
In the rest of the world this balance of powers is characterized by the profusion of dictatorial or authoritarian regimes that have dominated the political scene and that have influenced the future of their peoples. A second point is the emergence of serious and bloody war conflicts, by territorial issues, which is not explained very well both in its unleashing and in its results, as consequences of the mere quantification of the powers faced. In all these, both in its gestation and its consequences, the role it plays in the character, personal ambitions and strategic conceptions of the leaders or rulers who govern the destinies of the countries involved appears with particular relevance.
Explanation:
Fees charge = 2%
Investment worth = $500,000
Amount due = 2/100 * 500,000 = 10,000
The amount Andrew will receive as compensation is $10,000.
Answer:
D. The threat of takeovers tends to reduce potential conflicts between stockholders and managers.
Explanation:
As with the threat of takeover, there comes the risk of losing control, power, monetary benefits, the stockholder's tend to agree with managers, and the manager's tend to agree with stockholders.
As both aims for no takeover of the company, both work in for each other, agreeing to the suggestions placed.
There is no dis-regard to any of the suggestions paid by any of the party. This threat actually creates moral harmony and unity among stakeholders and management.
Therefore, correct answer is:
D. The threat of takeovers tends to reduce potential conflicts between stockholders and managers.
Answer:
economic (or business) cycles are less severe.
Explanation:
If the wages follow the general price level, it means that they will follow the inflation rate. When the economy is strong and inflation might rise, then the wages should increase accordingly. When the economy is starting to enter a recession then the inflation rate will reduce, so wages will not increase as much (if any increase at all).
This type of economic policy favors expansion cycles since private consumption is the main component of the GDP and also helps when the economy enters a recession because the wages will follow inflation rate which will help make the recession less severe and hopefully shorter.
One basic concept for this to work is that inflation is always a positive number, countries rarely (if ever) go through deflation processes.
