I NEED HELP, JUST LOOK AT THE PICTURE I ATTACHED
2 answers:
You might be interested in
Fatima's claim is not supported by the table because, the distribution is skewed right, with a median of 0.4 field goal advantage.
From the table, the median position is calculated as:
The 0.2nd data falls in the 0.4 field goal category.
So, the median element is:
However, the distribution of the table are concentrated on the left.
This means that, the distribution is not uniform, instead it is skewed right.
A uniform distribution has a skewness of 0.
Hence, Fatima's claim is not supported by the table
Read more about distributions at:
Answer:
equivalent to
Step-by-step explanation:
Given ratio,
It can be written as
cancel common factor,