Answer: option C
Explanation: THIS CAN BE REPRESENTED AS FOLLOWS :-
If we eliminate the product there would be no sales, no variable expenses and therefore, no contribution.
sales = nil
-variable expenses= <u>nil</u>
contribution = nil
- fixed expenses = <u>56,000</u>
NET LOSS = <u> (56000)</u>
.
NOTE :-
Fixed expense = (140,000)*(40%)= 56,000
.
.
Thus increase in loss would be 56000- 50,000=6000
A change in depreciation method is treated as a change in estimate that is achieved by a change in accounting principle, and is accounted for prospectively in the current and future periods.
The rules and regulations that businesses and other organizations must abide by when reporting financial data are known as accounting principles. These regulations standardize the terminology and procedures that accountants must employ, making it simpler to analyze financial data.
A unified set of accounting guidelines, methods, and standards known as generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) were released by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB).
The consistency that accounting principles establish enables more accurate and effective viewing of financial statements and reporting for businesses.
Learn more about accounting principles here
brainly.com/question/5399294
#SPJ4
Answer:
The legislature budget board and the governor are authorize to transfer money from one agency to other.
Explanation:
Given:
Money needs to be transferred from 1 agency to other when legislature is not in session:
Solution:
When Legislature is not in session, the legislature budget board and the governor are authorize to transfer the money from one agency to other during emergencies.
Answer:
it would be A the two forms are: Partnership & Corporation
Explanation:
please give me brainlist, like you said
Answer:
First of all, an auditor must be skeptical about the information that he/she is gathering and analyzing. They should try to get as much audit evidence as they can in order to form an opinion. But an auditor can also reasonably assure that there are no material misstatements, either intentional or not intentional.
Most auditor procedures are intended to discover unintentional misstatements, but intentional misstatements are very hard to discover because more than one individual (or even a very large group) might have colluded in order to conceal them. The auditor gets his information from the controller, internal auditor, and other people within the organization, but what if they all colluded in order to conceal their bad actions.
E.g. an auditor should check for shipping receipts to be complete, accurate and in order, but he/she relies on information given by the same people that he/she is evaluating. The auditor can conclude that the shipping reports are complete, but he/she cannot state that they are true and valid because he/she wasn't there.