Answer:
The correct answer would be, Shawn would pull over as soon as he sees the broken car.
Explanation:
Altruism is the general concept of helping others and finding happiness in it. It is basically the moral practice of concern. It is the act of kindness for the concern of happiness with human beings or animals, to get both moral and spiritual satisfaction. So on the basis of this concept, bystander intervention and helping behavior, Shawn is most likely to stop his car as soon as he sees a car being broken. He would immediately come out of his car to help the persons in the car who might be injured because of the accident.
The correct option is HUMANISTIC THEORY OF MOTIVATION.
This theory is based on the fact that humans have basic needs, which must be met. The basic physiological needs of man include food, water, shelter and clothing. One needs money to secure all these needs. Thus financial security is one of the component of humanistic theory of motivation.<span />
Answer: Hari is in the best relationship so far and would recover faster than Adams difficult relationship and Neela who just broke off a relationship
Explanation:
An healthy relationship is therapeutic. It goes a long way to heal an individual normally. Having someone who gives you happiness and peace of mind can make you live happier on life than even some material acquisition and the body works with the mind for recovery, having a relationship that is not in a good shape can affect your mood and slow down the healing process. Hari is in the best relationship so far and would recover faster than Adams difficult relationship and Neela who just broke off a relationship
Answer:
10
Explanation:
In 2003, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) proposed that in determining any risk, regulators should assume children have 10 times the exposure risk of adults to cancer-causing chemicals. Some health scientists contends that these guidelines are too weak. They suggest that, to be on safe side, we should assume that the risk of harm from toxins is 100 times that of adults. Others support doing this on ethical grounds, they say it is wrong not to give children much greater protection from harmful chemicals in the environment.