Question

in terms of comparisons in health care outcomes across​ countries, the​ economist's observation a. does not have relevance because health care outcomes are affected by many different factors and can be difficult to measure. b. has relevance because health care outcomes is a quality of life issue. c. has relevance because health care outcomes are affected by many different factors and can be difficult to measure. d. does not have relevance because health care outcomes is a quality of life issue.

Answer 1

Choice C, The economist's observation is pertinent when comparing healthcare results between nations since they can be hard to evaluate and are influenced by a variety of factors.

We can decide how to best manage our patients by measuring health outcomes, and outcome metrics help us identify the people who could benefit from a certain intervention the most. It enables us to spot any improvement that occurs following a certain action.

These arrangements of industry sales and acquisitions demonstrate how interwoven the whole economy is.

Being alive, doing well cognitively, physically, and socially, and feeling content are all examples of positive health outcomes. Death, function loss, and a lack of well-being are examples of negative consequences.

Learn more about the health outcomes at

brainly.com/question/14338721?referrer=searchResults

#SPJ4