Answer:
<em>Adult Acts:</em>
<em>Adults are prosecuted for “committing crimes”. </em>
<em>Juvenile Acts:</em>
<em>juveniles are prosecuted for committing “delinquent acts.” Many states classify juvenile offenders as those who are between the ages of ten and eighteen. In other words, anyone under eighteen is a juvenile, but you must be at least ten years of age to enter into the juvenile justice system. In other states, however, the age at which an offender is treated as an adult may be as young as sixteen or seventeen</em>
Explanation:
Answer:
I believe that someone could argue xenophobia in that case. Because not all people of a nation are going to be bad or want revenge, I think that since he was a decedent that he shouldn't have been penalized Because he never made a threat or showed any signs of danger to anyone.
Explanation:
Government !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Answer:
yes
Explanation:
Given set data base has every new born child's DNA towards every passing of every other. Not meaning habing a crimjnal record puts blood and suliva but preamble DNA from birth, now rather than having to point match on criminal data, rather pre-set DNA data base on every human living or non-living.
Properly deviding DNA base still into split sections for criminal records amd clean records where clean record's are rather added/stamped when found guilty in the court of law, but then having all possible DNA sample at the touch of a button (rather should i say match) pre-liminates playing detective and running around following leads, ensuring closure towards deceased members familiy and aswell as eliminating wrongful imprisonment of non guilty members that adds unnecessary cost and reclurces towrards goverment funds etc.
Having "system that works, why fix" is not as having a system that continuously improves and sustains a flawless lrocedure rather than groping at the mids of a cold case in the hope that somewhere a light switch gets turned or a whistleblower apears is high waist of reacources and complete over kill. Given we are in a modern time where tech constantly improves to ease the human race, why not sustain a even rise in our modern living standards and consecutive growth in a that's even the slightest of possibilities.
Answer: no that judge need evidence of that person
Explanation:
