Answer:
B.If the statue conflicts with the US
A tort, in common law jurisdiction, is a civil wrong that causes a claimant to suffer loss or harm, resulting in legal liability for the person who commits a tortious act. It can include the intentional infliction of emotional distress, negligence, financial losses, injuries, invasion of privacy and many other things.
i googled “tort law is generally based on what?” and this is all that came up so idk if that helps or if you still need help with that
If the police had no warrant saying they could go in or search Joe's house then the police could be in a certain amount of trouble as well seeing as Joe did not willingly let them in and they never had a warrant but Joe could be in a lot more trouble for being in the possession of drugs.
And smart homes should be more advanced to these kinds of things because they could have been fake cops, plus they had no warrant which leaves everyone in this situation at fault especially Joe for being in the possession of drugs and the possible false 911 call influenced on drugs either making him see things or think things, maybe even both.
Answer:
option 2
Explanation:
contribute to the common good
hope this helps. good luck
Answer:
А. They may have to rely on former friends for transportation, putting them back in touch with the criminal world.
Explanation:
Being a criminal isn't an individual thing, rather it is really a group situation. For many offenders, their only friends are other criminals or those more likely to commit criminal acts. Thus, having only their friends to rely on for rides (Which is what most people will do) creates a risk of secondary deviance.
