1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
MrMuchimi
3 years ago
12

Facts of the case

Law
1 answer:
netineya [11]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

I believe that someone could argue xenophobia in that case. Because not all people of a nation are going to be bad or want revenge,  I think that since he was a decedent that he shouldn't have been penalized Because he never made a threat or showed any signs of danger to anyone.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Which is the most important idea that should be embraced?
worty [1.4K]

A copy of Trotha's Extermination Order survives in the Botswana National Archives. The order states "every Herero, with or without a gun, with or without cattle, will be shot. I will no longer accept women or children, I will drive them back to their people [to die in the desert] or let them be shot at."

8 0
3 years ago
“Law is not a factual statement (description is not in the nature of law); it is rather a prescriptive tool which purports to sh
Ugo [173]

According to what is expressed in the fragment, it can be inferred that the purpose of the sentence is to clarify that laws are created to modify human behavior.

<h3>What is a law?</h3>

A law is a term to refer to a norm or rule of society that citizens must comply with in order to live in harmony with others.

Laws are one of the oldest social tools in the world because they guarantee that citizens have a more controlled behavior with respect to others. Additionally, this provides them with some obligations that they must fulfill to belong to the social group.

According to the above, it can be inferred that the fragment refers to the fact that laws are an adequate tool to modify human behavior according to the needs of society.

Learn more about law in: brainly.com/question/6590381

#SPJ1

8 0
2 years ago
If you were a prosecuting attorney, and you KNEW FOR FACT that the defendant had committed a crime, would you commit misconduct
Pepsi [2]

As the prosecuting attorney,  your role is to defend the defendant in regards to the case and even if they had committed a crime, you have to make sure that they are not proven guilty or they are acquitted.

To some extent, the level of crime or crime type matter because some prosecuting attorney will let their clients go if it a petty crime but when it is a crime such as murder, misappropriation of funds, they may never compromise.

<h3>What is this case about?</h3>

If you known that it is a huge crime and your conscience cannot allow you to let the man go so that he will not do it again, you can tell the opposition lawyer anonymously but this may jeopardize your law career if caught.

The right thing to do is to step down from been the prosecuting attorney and then you can be free from that guilt of betrayal to yourself and to the defendant and then one can properly submit the evidence to the  opposition lawyer.

Learn more about prosecuting attorney from

brainly.com/question/11589445

#SPJ1

7 0
2 years ago
Your friend wears ears buds while driving to school each day. Is this safe? Why or why not
alekssr [168]

Answer:

It is not safe

Explanation:

Because if you have ear buds in you cannot hear siren's of police,fire, or tornado warnings (the tornado warnings a little bit of a long shot but u get the point I think) also you won't be able to hear someone honk at you if they are trying to prevent an collision or warn you of something you would be otherwise oblivious to.

8 0
3 years ago
Where in the constitution are judicial nominations described?
myrzilka [38]

Answer:

Judicial nominations are described in<u> Article II, Section II.</u>

Explanation:

<u>Article II, Section II, also known as the Appointments Clause of the Constitution</u>, gives the President the authority to nominate public officials, including justices of the Supreme Court. However, before the nominee can become a justice, he or she must be rejected or confirmed by the Senate.

In the judicial nominations, then, both the Executive branch and the Legislative branch have a role. This Clause is an example of how the Checks and Balance system works; in this system, each branch of the government oversee, limit and control the other so that no branch abuse from its powers.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • contracts for the sale of fabric, automobiles, computers, furniture, and paper clips would all be governed by Article 2 of the U
    6·1 answer
  • Is the grandfather clause still in effect for tobacco
    6·1 answer
  • Which other qualifications must a citizen meet before he or she can serve on a jury?
    7·2 answers
  • Which statement is NOT correct regarding the arrest of suspects?
    14·1 answer
  • I hate it<br> its sooodum
    14·2 answers
  • What’s the worst punishment 12yr. can get if he drinks underage? (by the way i do nit refer to me as the 12yr, just asking p.s.
    12·2 answers
  • Which one is it help please
    7·1 answer
  • Why is the Bill of Rights still controversial today?
    5·2 answers
  • In three or four sentences, describe why the vice president in a company makes a very high salary while a person who works in hu
    13·2 answers
  • can someone please tell me one law that can be Breck and you will not go to jail A there are no law like that B .......... C I t
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!