All categories

1 year ago

a segregation of duties among employees always eliminates the possibility of collusion. group of answer choices true false

Business

1 answer:

ozzi1 year ago

7 0

Dividing tasks between employees always eliminates the possibility of collusion, but this is wrong.

Segregation of duties is important for effective internal control because it reduces the risk of errors or improper conduct. Preventing collusion helps fight fraud.

Separation of duties is an important practice to reduce the occurrence of errors and fraud by ensuring that employees do not have the opportunity to commit or conceal errors or fraud in the performance of their duties. That is internal control.

Separation of duties reduces the risk of fraud or misconduct as each affected employee has access controls and restrictions in place. Task division is delegating different steps of the process to different people to delegate important functions.

To learn more about collusion

brainly.com/question/14409158

#SPJ4

You might be interested in

The following data represent quantities of tea leaf pluckings (tender shoots from tea plants) from sixteen different plots of te

mr_godi [17]

Answer:

Explanation:

1) $H_0$ : All group means equal or $\mu _1=\mu _2=\mu _3=\mu _4$

$H_1:\mu 1=\mu 2=\mu 3\neq \mu 4$

At least one of the treatment group means are different

ANOVA TABLE

Source of Variation SS df MS F P-value F crit

Between Groups 213.5 3 71.16667 0.65 0.5975 3.490295

Within Groups 1312.5 12 109.375

MSB = SSB / DFB = 71.16667

MSE = SSE / DFE = 109.375

F = MSB / MSE = 0.650667

3) P-value: 0.597576

The test statistic is not significant and failed to reject the null hypothesis.

4) The test statistic is not significant. So, there is no evidence to conclude that there is a difference between groups.

4 0

3 years ago

Through which method of involuntary alienation may the government take private land for public use?

Oduvanchick [21]

Eminent domain is the governments' power to take private land for public use.

Which of the following is an involuntary alienation of property?

Involuntary Alienation. Involuntary alienation is the transfer of real estate by law and without the owner's consent.
There are 4 methods by which this is accomplished: foreclosure, eminent domain, adverse possession, and by escheat.

Which of the following is an involuntary alienation of property?

A grantor does not wish to be responsible for defects in the title that arise from previous owners but will guarantee the title for the time the grantor has the ownership.

What is involuntary alienation ?

Involuntary Alienation. Involuntary alienation is the transfer of ownership without consent and control of the owner.

Learn more about Involuntary Alienation

brainly.com/question/14675036

#SPJ4

8 0

1 year ago

Evaluate a team you have been part of in terms of its size, composition and characteristics compared to those of an 'ideal' team

zaharov [31]

Answer:

Check screenshot

Explanation:

7 0

3 years ago

A local restaurant, Farm Fresh Ingredients, has become highly successful through its menu, based solely on organically raised ch

Blizzard [7]

Answer:

d. temporary

Explanation:

Competitive advantage refers to a competitive edge a firm gains over it's competitors by offering better value via it's products or by offering such products at reduced prices.

Competitive advantage results out of a unique or specific methods of production which is more efficient than the competitors and most importantly which cannot be imitated by competitors.

In the given case, the advantage which has accrued is on account of organic method of raising chickens and organic seasonal produce. These advantages are momentarily as, soon other restaurants shall follow suit and gradually these shall disappear.

8 0

3 years ago

Your mother and father are retired and need income to live on. The local financial advisor offers to sell them a product that wi

klio [65]

Answer:

To evaluate the choice, we have to calculate the present value of future cash flows and compare it with the cost. We use the following formula

present value = C × [ $\frac{1 - (1 + i)^{-n} }{i}$ ]

where

C = yearly payments = 75000

i = interest rate = 8%

n = no. of years = 15

put the given values in above equation, we get

Present value = 75000 ×8.559478688

= 641,961

Since the present value of cash flow 641,961 is less than the cost 750,000, I would not recommend it.

If Interest rate = 5%, then:

Do the same procedure as above but take i=5%

Present value = 75000 × 10.37965804

= 778,474

Since the present value of future cash flows 778,474 is greater than the cost 750,000, I would recommend it.

3 0

4 years ago