Answer:
Now, people have to sneak across the border a lot more and are immigrating for a better life. But, 100 years ago, the regulations weren't as harsh and people were escaping their country for survival/
Explanation:
The answer is C: 3 - 4 - 1 - 2
3) Paco's <em>introdution</em>, presenting the topic.
4) <em>Development</em> of the text mentioning the claim that defends De Luca's argument.
1) Use of connecting words, "in addition" to give continuity and <em>complete the</em> <em>statement before.</em>
2. <em>Conclusion</em> stating that in the end De Lucas's argument was concincing.
In an "An Indian Father's Plea," Medicine Grizzlybear Lake asks the teacher to (C) Give him a second chance and treat him more fairly.
In "An Indian Father's Plea" by Robert Lake, Wind-wolf is the son of Medicine Gizzlybear. The father has faith in his son and has an argument with the teacher when the teacher calls his son a slow learner. The teacher was unable to understand the learning patter of Wind-wolf. The father then asked to the teacher to Give him a second chance and treat him more fairly.
Therefore, the correct answer is (C).
Learn more about An Indian Father's Plea on brainly.com/question/6001504
#SPJ4
Disclaimer:
The options for the given question are missing. The options are:
A. Teach him the white man's way so that he can fit in
B. Let him fail the class so he can come home
C. Give him a second chance and treat him more fairly
D. Make the class easier for him because of his background
The context clues show that Nick believes that we should not continue to send human beings into space.
<h3>What are context clues?</h3>
It should be noted that context clues are the hints that are given by the author in a literary work to help readers understand.
In this case, the context clues show that Nick believes that we should not continue to send human beings into space as they believe that humans destroy space.
Learn more about context clues on:
brainly.com/question/11247029
#SPJ1
<u> D. Men are only human and fallible themselves and cannot claim their opinions to be divine and infallible.</u>
The excerpt asserts rulers' nature (both civilian and ecclesiastical): they are fallible, imperfect, and uninspired men. Still, over the centuries, they have established and imposed their opinions on others as reliable, as the only truth. But this is wrong, the divine, and the truth can not depend on men's opinions or beliefs about what they think it's right. In conclusion, men with their fallible and imperfect nature, cannot claim their opinions to be divine and infallible.
