What did the Supreme Court rule in Baker v Carr ?.

1 answer:

4 0

The United States Supreme Court ruled in Baker v. Carr (1962) held federal courts could review claims that a state's redistricting of electoral lines violates the Equal 14th Amendment Amendment to the Constitution.

About Equal Protection Clause

The United States Constitution's Fourteenth Amendment's first section contains the Equal Protection Clause. The article states that "neither shall any state deny to any individual within its authority the equal protection of laws." It came into force in 1868. It demands that the law treat people equally who are in similar circumstances. Civil Rights Act of 1866's equality provisions were a major driving force behind the inclusion of this paragraph.

To know more about Baker v. Carr:

brainly.com/question/29398317

#SPJ4

You might be interested in

Cagney and Lacey enter into a written contract to open a bookstore specializing in detective novels. The written contract is a 2

Yuliya22 [10]

Um please provide pictures

4 0

2 years ago

What weather factor is consistently connected to crime in studies

soldier1979 [14.2K]

Answer:

I think It's temperature

Explanation:

3 0

3 years ago

Glenn thinks there is too much noise at night in his neighborhood. He would like to see stricter laws passed to ban loud music o

Wewaii [24]

Answer: showing posters and handing them out or get signers

Explanation:

Glenn after he gets enough signers can go to the court house or face off to those people himself.

and say yah suck

8 0

3 years ago

The emphasis on rehabilitation in our criminal justice system has produced substantially lower rates of recidivism. T or F.

ser-zykov [4K]

True.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

7 0

3 years ago

In 1996 California legalized the medical use of marijuana, even though it was still illegal under federal law. Californians Ange

BartSMP [9]

Answer:

The federal government's argument must prevail.

Explanation:

The medical marijuana of Angel Raich and Diane Monson really affects the interstate marijuana market and interferes with government control of that product. In this case, the federal government has the authority to regulate and prohibit the consumption and sale of this product. In this case, the action of justice in destroying the factories of Angel and Diane was correct, and it is not up to them to open a case in their defenses.

4 0

3 years ago