1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
yan [13]
1 year ago
8

What did the Supreme Court rule in Baker v Carr ?.

Law
1 answer:
Tanya [424]1 year ago
4 0

The United States Supreme Court ruled in Baker v. Carr (1962) held federal courts could review claims that a state's redistricting of electoral lines violates the Equal 14th Amendment Amendment to the Constitution.

About Equal Protection Clause

The United States Constitution's Fourteenth Amendment's first section contains the Equal Protection Clause. The article states that "neither shall any state deny to any individual within its authority the equal protection of laws." It came into force in 1868. It demands that the law treat people equally who are in similar circumstances.  Civil Rights Act of 1866's equality provisions were a major driving force behind the inclusion of this paragraph.

To know more about Baker v. Carr:

brainly.com/question/29398317

#SPJ4

You might be interested in
Help me answer all of these , i’ll give brainlist !
Mrac [35]

Answer:

1.implied

2.expressed

3.expressed

4.expressed

5.implied

6.implied

7.implied

8.expressed

9.expressed

10. implied

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
How many terms can the president of the united states serve?
Ghella [55]
2 terms in total each term lasting 4 years
6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Stopping mail services and locking all windows and doors are typical items on a
Darina [25.2K]

Answer:  very expensive store

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
What does this amendment prevent the us government from doing?
Tema [17]
The 5th amendment prevents federal government from depriving a person.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Lindsey lived in a public housing project. The Housing Authority tacked an eviction notice on Lindsey’s door, giving her notice
Daniel [21]

Answer:

No

Explanation:

Because the Housing Authority tacked an eviction notice on Lindsey’s door. That means she has to receive it. If they send it through the mail, it'll make sense that she hasn't received the letter because it could be lost in the other mail, but the Housing Authority put it on the door which means she did see it, but she just ignored it. She knows that she was supposed to come to court on time and on the correct date. It's like if she's turning in homework late in #oogle Classroom while ignoring the due date and time. To be honest, I think that maybe the Housing Authority should of give her at least two or three warnings, but Lindsey did actually see the letter.

Brainlist pls!

4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Who must obey the law in the United States?
    11·2 answers
  • What are the two key properties of eye<br> witness testimony
    5·2 answers
  • How does the right to file a lawsuit protect people?
    9·1 answer
  • The method of delivering a chemical or any other agent is called
    10·1 answer
  • 7. What is the primary purpose of a statute?
    13·1 answer
  • Which amendment places a 2 term limit on the President of the United<br> States *
    15·1 answer
  • F points just answer this 12/56 888
    7·2 answers
  • The system on some vehicles adjust order to create better balance while driving at high speed?
    6·1 answer
  • Documentation procedures should include photographing, measuring, sketching, and video recording the scene.
    11·2 answers
  • Discuss how Madison managed to market the Constitution.​
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!