1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Anastasy [175]
3 years ago
7

Why might a convenience store in a crowded city be more likely to experience robbery than one that is the only store in a rural

county?
Law
1 answer:
s2008m [1.1K]3 years ago
6 0
Rural country’s are more peaceful and most people that live there live there because it is peaceful and not a lot of people live there. In a crowded city, there is diversity and it’s much more populated. Let’s say New York City runs out of canned beans, but Missouri still has canned beans because they have less people buying them but they also have farms over there. People would want to steal from places that do have canned beans in New York City because it’s in demand but not in Missouri.
You might be interested in
Women are more likely to develop __________ from excessive drinking than men.
Ne4ueva [31]
Women are more likely to develop health risks of Alcohol related problems
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who might be contacted in a background check of a police applicant?
evablogger [386]
All of above

As they need all sides of the spectrum and who is fit for the job.


#bluelivesmatter
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why didn't the member of parliament understand how the americans felt
gogolik [260]
I think it’s because they weren’t taxed like the Americans were or it could be that they weren’t taxed as much
5 0
3 years ago
Một hành vi có thể đồng thời là vi phạm pháp luật hình sự vừa là vi phạm pháp luật hành chính, nhưng không thể đồng thời vừa là
Naily [24]

Câu trả lời là có. Nhiều phiên tòa có thể vừa dân sự vừa hình sự. Ví dụ, một người cố ý giết người khác có thể bị buộc tội giết người tại tòa án hình sự và cũng có thể bị kiện dân sự về tội chết oan.

8 0
3 years ago
19. Which of the following evidence would always be admissible in-court?
Drupady [299]

Answer:

"Evidence that is formally presented before the trier of fact (i.e., the judge or jury) to consider in deciding the case. The trial court judge determines whether or not the evidence may be proffered. To be admissible in court, the evidence must be relevant (i.e., material and having probative value) and not outweighed by countervailing considerations (e.g., the evidence is unfairly prejudicial, confusing, a waste of time, privileged, or based on hearsay). Also termed competent evidence; proper evidence; legal evidence."

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Does the child in the crosswalk have the right of way? Explain why or why not? I will give brainliest for best answer
    13·1 answer
  • - During the Industrial Revolution in Europe,
    10·1 answer
  • Go to the internet -Please include a reference in the discussion post of your case!
    7·1 answer
  • What does the phrase ""full faith and credit"" mean in article iv of the constitution?
    8·1 answer
  • How many police zones does Port Orange FL have?
    15·1 answer
  • Which of the following positions in law
    8·2 answers
  • What does it mean to say that people's choices have future consequences?​
    6·2 answers
  • Who elects or appoints Representative and Senators?
    8·1 answer
  • महर्षि दयानंद का निर्वाण होने पर इन्होंने<br>ऋषि ऋण चुकाने के लिए क्या किया ?​
    5·1 answer
  • What are three religious texts that are used as authority? for business law 1
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!