1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
gogolik [260]
3 years ago
14

How do lobbyists differ from political action committees (PACs)?

Law
1 answer:
Rainbow [258]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

A lobbyist is a professional whose job is to make contacts with influential people in Washington (or whatever government) and make a case on behalf of a client. They're regulated under the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995. If you're spending most of your time chatting with Congressmen, then you need to file forms saying who you're talking to and on whose behalf. These forms are filed with the clerks in the House and the Senate.

While a Political Action Committee (PAC) is a group of people with some kind of interest. They collect money and spend it to promote that interest. They have to file forms, with the Federal Election Commission rather than with the legislative branch, though unlike the lobbyists they have ways to not disclose who's giving them money. They can hold public meetings, buy TV advertising, donate money to causes, give money to candidates (a small amount- about $5k to candidates and $15k to parties), and hire lobbyists.

Generally, when a PAC hires a lobbyist, the lobbyist is the one to go to the legislator and make the case on behalf of the PAC. They may also bring the PAC's own team to make the presentation, but they need to be very careful about crossing the (byzantine) set of rules trying to keep the ethical lines clear-ish. Conceivably, they could have lobbyists on staff, but it exposes the entire organization to levels of disclosure that they'd generally rather not have. Thus, the usual plan is for a PAC to hire an established lobbying firm, who is already registered and prepared to handle the paperwork.

Explanation:

Hope this helped :)

You might be interested in
I need a reflection of civil contracts
Archy [21]

Answer:

A contract is an agreement between at least two natural or legal persons – the parties, or more specifically contractors – about what they will do with each other or for each other – the performance to be delivered – or not.

Contracts must be distinguished from obligations: an agreement creates an obligation, but the reverse is not always the case. If someone inflicts damage on another, this may result in an obligation to compensate it.

Sometimes a contract has a predetermined term, the period for which it applies.  These must in principle be fulfilled. If the other party does not fulfill an agreement, it can, if necessary, be enforced through the courts.

3 0
3 years ago
What term is used in the law when both parties are equally responsible for an illegal agreement?
aivan3 [116]

Answer: Pari delicto

Explanation:

The Pari delicto is a legal principle that means both parties are legally and equally responsible for making an illegal agreement or executing crime due to common interest. The term is common for the relief that is being denied to both parties under the civil proceedings because of equal responsibility of commission of wrongdoing by both parties. This legal principle ensures the equitable defense.

6 0
3 years ago
What is the difference between original jurisdiction and appellate jurisdiction
Drupady [299]
Answer : Original jurisdiction means that the court has the right to hear the case first.

Appellate jurisdiction means that the court hears an appeal from a court of original jurisdiction
8 0
3 years ago
Will give 100 points and brainliest to person with right answer and explanation
polet [3.4K]

Answer:

B the trial will begin

Explanation:

If the lawyers for each side of a case are questioning people who received a jury summons, the trial is currently in the "jury selection phase," and the trial will follow. At this time the prosecution and the defense are deciding on who will be a part of the jury for the trial.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Does an officer need to witness the crime to arrest an individual for a misdemeanor?
Eduardwww [97]

Answer:yes

Explanation:

Yes

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • A court challenge to a promulgated rule based on the theory that the agency exceeded its authority is: a. a substantial evidence
    9·1 answer
  • A president's cabinet usually includes all of the following individuals EXCEPT
    9·2 answers
  • Oscar has a degenerative eye disease that is causing him to gradually lose his eyesight. When Oscar asked his employer to purcha
    6·1 answer
  • List the seven grave sins​
    12·1 answer
  • FORENSICS HELP!!!
    6·2 answers
  • Why do most people care less about state and local governments even though they have for more impact on their lives than federal
    10·2 answers
  • Due process protections under the 5th Amendment include all of the following except:
    8·1 answer
  • A spouse can be provided information such as hospital
    13·1 answer
  • What type of criminal suspect is most likely to be given bail during their court case?.
    5·2 answers
  • _______ is the application of law from previous cases to current cases with substantially similar circumstances.
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!