1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
gogolik [260]
3 years ago
14

How do lobbyists differ from political action committees (PACs)?

Law
1 answer:
Rainbow [258]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

A lobbyist is a professional whose job is to make contacts with influential people in Washington (or whatever government) and make a case on behalf of a client. They're regulated under the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995. If you're spending most of your time chatting with Congressmen, then you need to file forms saying who you're talking to and on whose behalf. These forms are filed with the clerks in the House and the Senate.

While a Political Action Committee (PAC) is a group of people with some kind of interest. They collect money and spend it to promote that interest. They have to file forms, with the Federal Election Commission rather than with the legislative branch, though unlike the lobbyists they have ways to not disclose who's giving them money. They can hold public meetings, buy TV advertising, donate money to causes, give money to candidates (a small amount- about $5k to candidates and $15k to parties), and hire lobbyists.

Generally, when a PAC hires a lobbyist, the lobbyist is the one to go to the legislator and make the case on behalf of the PAC. They may also bring the PAC's own team to make the presentation, but they need to be very careful about crossing the (byzantine) set of rules trying to keep the ethical lines clear-ish. Conceivably, they could have lobbyists on staff, but it exposes the entire organization to levels of disclosure that they'd generally rather not have. Thus, the usual plan is for a PAC to hire an established lobbying firm, who is already registered and prepared to handle the paperwork.

Explanation:

Hope this helped :)

You might be interested in
Olivia is an elderly lady who calls her police department to report that her neighbor keeps putting his trash can out too early.
Dvinal [7]

Answer:

a

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Which source would be the MOST biased when it comes to evaluating the current American presidency, compared to past presidents?
vfiekz [6]

Some of the sources that can be biassed when it comes to evaluating the current American presidency compared to past presidents include current executive members

Other biased sources include the following:

  • Political party members of the President,
  • Previous schools the current President attended,
  • Family of the current President
  • The political party the President belonged to,
  • The special assistants to the current President, etc.

The sources that would be biased when evaluating the current American presidency compared to past presidents are those closest to the President or in support of the incumbent President.

Hence, in this case, it is concluded that many sources supporting the current President will be biased towards his cause.

Learn more here: brainly.com/question/20646239

3 0
2 years ago
According to V.O Key Jr. the three primary roles of American political parties according to Key are:
Tomtit [17]

The most accessible role of political party of America according to the V. O. Key Jr., is the voting part where voters uses shortcuts to identify the candidates implying with similar or same ideology and policy.

Answer: Option 2

<u>Explanation: </u>

Val dimer Orlando Key Jr. was a political scientist of American origin, who gave the political theory and studied politics closely identified or specified many roles and responsibility.

Of all those, most important part which is accessible to the public which pertains to involvement of public is the independent voting system, as listed under option 2.

3 0
3 years ago
Which of the following situations would not substantiate proper standing to sue​
PtichkaEL [24]

Answer:

The answer is B

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
‘Remixing technologies is how are kids speak."" Do you agree with this statement? Why or why not?
Tcecarenko [31]
Remixing technologies is how our kids speak.” Do you agree with this statement? ... A:Yes because kids are getting more and more into technology at a very young age and need to know what it's like without an ipphone or laptop like the rest of us.
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which type of courts may also be known as limited-jurisdiction courts?
    6·1 answer
  • In the 19th Century two prison systems controlled
    6·1 answer
  • What is an international agreement that requires senate approval
    12·1 answer
  • Waterfront Hotels Corporation in Boston offers a job to Carol, who lives in Denver. Carol orally agrees to work for Waterfront f
    9·1 answer
  • (DO NOT GIVE FALSE ANSWERS)
    7·2 answers
  • You are oh the train station writing for your trai. To arrive. You see a vending machine from where you can buy snacks and chips
    7·1 answer
  • what are the consequences to a silent partner in a partnership when the partnership is unable to pay off debt​
    9·2 answers
  • ¿
    12·2 answers
  • Will the police be given less money if defunded
    14·2 answers
  • Please help due today
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!