1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
gogolik [260]
3 years ago
14

How do lobbyists differ from political action committees (PACs)?

Law
1 answer:
Rainbow [258]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

A lobbyist is a professional whose job is to make contacts with influential people in Washington (or whatever government) and make a case on behalf of a client. They're regulated under the Lobbying Disclosure Act of 1995. If you're spending most of your time chatting with Congressmen, then you need to file forms saying who you're talking to and on whose behalf. These forms are filed with the clerks in the House and the Senate.

While a Political Action Committee (PAC) is a group of people with some kind of interest. They collect money and spend it to promote that interest. They have to file forms, with the Federal Election Commission rather than with the legislative branch, though unlike the lobbyists they have ways to not disclose who's giving them money. They can hold public meetings, buy TV advertising, donate money to causes, give money to candidates (a small amount- about $5k to candidates and $15k to parties), and hire lobbyists.

Generally, when a PAC hires a lobbyist, the lobbyist is the one to go to the legislator and make the case on behalf of the PAC. They may also bring the PAC's own team to make the presentation, but they need to be very careful about crossing the (byzantine) set of rules trying to keep the ethical lines clear-ish. Conceivably, they could have lobbyists on staff, but it exposes the entire organization to levels of disclosure that they'd generally rather not have. Thus, the usual plan is for a PAC to hire an established lobbying firm, who is already registered and prepared to handle the paperwork.

Explanation:

Hope this helped :)

You might be interested in
What happens if you disclose classified information?
Vedmedyk [2.9K]

According to the Espionage Act, it is illegal to intentionally disclose classified information without consent. Up to ten years in prison, a hefty fine, or even being accused of treason are possible penalties.

The disclosure of classified material is prohibited by a number of federal statutes. The law bans the knowing and intentional transmission of specific classified information to an unauthorized person under Title 18 of the United States Code, Section 798. Only information about American communications intelligence systems and operations is covered in this section. Any of the following actions concerning sensitive information that are done knowingly and willingly are illegal:

  1. communication, provision, transmission, or availability in any other way to an unauthorized individual
  2. Release it
  3. Use it in a manner that is harmful to government interests or safety.

A conviction for unauthorized disclosure carries a sentence of up to 10 years in jail, a large fine, or both.

To know more about classified information, refer:

brainly.com/question/25031712

#SPJ4

8 0
1 year ago
Why is plagiarism considered a crime?
Vlada [557]

Answer:

because the writer takes ideas from a source without giving proper credit to the author.

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Baker and others entered a Wal-Mart store shortly after 3:00 A.M. by cutting through the metal door with an acetylene torch. Som
hodyreva [135]

Answer:

There are enough intent and action to commit a crime.  By burglarizing the store and moving some goods to the rear door, Baker and his co-travellers have established specific intent to commit larceny.

Specific intent requires planning before the time and the predisposition to commit the act.  They have even establish general intent by actually entering the store and cutting through the metal door with an acetylene torch.

Explanation:

Larceny is robbery.  The intent to commit a crime by Baker and his co-travellers is established by their actions at the crime scene.  They cannot be exonerated because they have not yet taken the goods away from the store.  But, it can be established that the intent exists merely by their presence at the crime scene at such an hour of the morning.

8 0
3 years ago
Alcohol can give you _________.
Verizon [17]

Answer:

B. double vision

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why is the purpose of a Speedy Trial under the Sixth Amendment?
zaharov [31]

Answer:

Its so that they cant make you wait in prison for years until a trial.

Explanation:

You have the right to a speedy trial, that means they cant make you wait for years and just keep you in prison or jail. They have to give you a trial and the 6th amendment makes it so it has to be quick (within a couple months or up to a year)

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Jessa wants to sell her product to a skeptical customer, so she claims it will last forever, even
    6·1 answer
  • Which celestial body orbits a planet?
    7·2 answers
  • Lucky canary is a car which can be transformed into a robot .......
    5·1 answer
  • how much proof is necessary for a criminal trial? how is this different from the amount of proof necessary in a civil trial?​
    5·2 answers
  • What is the maximum sentence for 1st degree manslaughter​
    7·2 answers
  • Pesticides are regulated by the
    13·1 answer
  • Is the u.s. a common law country
    7·1 answer
  • Why is there no one clear definition for a political conservative
    7·1 answer
  • Explain what the power to regulate interstate commerce means?.
    14·1 answer
  • What is the power of the majority?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!