Answer:
Aggregate demand is just the sum total of four components such as consumption, investment, government spending, and lastly net exports. Government spending and taxes are determined by political considerations with which imports and exports changes according to relative growth rates and prices between two economies. while Aggregate supply is just the total amount of goods and services that firms are willing to sell at a given price in an economy. The aggregate demand is the total amounts of goods and services that will be purchased at all possible price levels in an economies
Boosting aggregate demand also boosts the size of the economy regarding measured GDP. However, this does not prove that an increase in aggregate demand creates economic growth while for Aggregate supply is the total quantity of output firms will produce and sell, that is to, the real GDP.
The aggregate supply curve slopes up because when the price level for outputs increases while the price level of inputs remains fixed, the opportunity for additional profits encourages more production.
Answer:
Using alternative crops would help keep the soil healthy.
Explanation:
George Washington Carver who lived between 1860s to 1943 was an American agricultural scientist, and popularly known for his advocacy for alternative crops to cotton and methods to prevent soil depletion. He was considered as one of the foremost black scientist of the early 20th century
In his attempts to improve depleted soils for agricultural purpose, Carver developed techniques that involved farmers to grow other crops, such as peanuts and sweet potatoes, as a source of their own food and to improve their quality of life.
Hence, George Washington Carver think using alternative crops to cotton would help keep the soil healthy.
Abstract
The distribution of wealth in the world is manifested by the polarization of a rich North and a poor South. Is the North-South conflict increasing or decreasing, and does it depend on such variables as major power conflict, intra-Northern conflict, and world prosperity, as some schools of thought maintain? Focusing on these questions from a leadership-long cycle perspective suggests several hypotheses about the interrelationships between global economic growth, Northern antagonism, and North-South conflict. The effect of conflict on growth is also examined. Generating data on world economic growth and major power conflict, intra-Northern conflict, and North-South conflict for the period from 1870 to 1992, vector auto-regression analysis is used to test new hypotheses. Results provide considerable support for the new hypotheses, provide mixed support for the previous arguments, and show that the relationship between world economic growth and conflict is not the same before and after World War II.
They are more aware of their behavior and less concerned with what others think
I think it is D because their quest was to overturn Japan’s semi-colonial status an equal to the western powers. Hope this helps!
