There are good arguments on both sides as to when and how fast to reopen the economy. In my view, the answer will vary state by state and industry by industry. There’s also an enormous amount of uncertainty as to exactly how to determine the optimal policy. In that environment, there’s a great advantage to having these decisions be made at as local a level as possible. Thus, while I suspect that Sweden’s current policy is not optimal, that Nordic country is doing a great service to Europe by providing evidence on the consequences of an alternative policy path.
Giving too much power to any one person is dangerous, especially when that person might be influenced by political considerations that go beyond the best interest of the country as a whole:
That’s not to say Trump’s views are necessary wrong; rather that the procedure he uses to reach decisions is not reliable. Thus I’d still favor local control even if in one particular case you could convince me that the views of the person who happened to be president at the time were superior to the views of the average mayor or governor. In the long run, competition between states will produce better governance than central planning.
I thin the best way to know which of the bull is the father of you cow, find the bull that Marcelino has seen last day that the bulls have gone to the fence and let the cow be the bait and of the cow will agree on a bull that the bull could impregnate her again, i think he's the father. Its just my suggestion :)
The answer is granting citizenship.
There are both federal and state taxes. Holding courts is both a state and federal power. And states can define criminal acts, as every state has their own statutes, but so can the country as a whole.
